erpstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Javien Canada Inc. - Linux Developer
Thanks, I'll follow up with the results under 1.4-to-be tomorrow.
--
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-=- Jesus Loves you -=-
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
rc/libcwd/configure failed for src/libcwd
It seems that just the patch at the bottom of README isn't enough(?).
The generated `configure' still tries to execute a ltconfig.
What do I do wrong?
--
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECT
e
command line, then this should not lead to duplicated
macro errors imho.
As a work around, I will install automake and autoconf
twice (I need two versions of libtool to be installed).
--
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-=- Jesus Loves you -=-
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 02:32:24PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2000, Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Completely missing any notition of the libtool.m4 file
> > in /usr/local/share/aclocal.
>
> See the libtool manual. It advis
directory I have, and thus a lot more files :/. This is hardly
acceptable because that would increase the size of the tarball dramatically
(a `configure' script is LARGE).
There must be better way, I hope.
--
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-=- Jesus Loves you -=-
_
orking?
Thanks,
--
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-=- Jesus Loves you -=-
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Ok, nevermind. The workaround for the infinite configure loop
that occured with ealier versions (which now seems fixed) caused
an empty ltmain.sh file now (to be installed). I removed my own
patch and it works again.
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 12:45:49PM +0100, Carlo Wood wrote:
> Any reason t
Hi again,
nobody addressed the mail that I wrote a month ago, included again below,
it is still a problem for me however.
What is the right way of doing this? Or is indeed
something that is actually a problem with libtool?
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 03:31:04PM +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
> autoc
eate a .libs/libcw.a ?
Where is the .dll?
Also, this *.a is not usable because the libcw_la-version.lo is NOT linked in:
that only refers to a pic-object, not a non-pic-object. The result is a
useless (broken) static library.
Can someone please tell me what I am doing wrong?
I suppose you need mor
It would be better to turn this warning into a fatal error
on cygwin and to add a remark about the correct usage
of -no-undefined on windows.
--
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/ma
l,--no-whole-archive then something horrible gets wrong
that simply is not an option.
Can someone help me out please?
--
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 05:49:29PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> I think this is what the -export-dynamic flag is for.
If that is true, then it is broken.
--
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list
plication - only when you are creating a shared library.
I think this is a bug, because clearly an application that dlopen's
other libraries is no different from shared libraries in this regard:
you want all symbols to be export just as well.
doesn't mean that I am sitting on the beach
while that other person is fixing this; I work my ass off around the clock
on Open Source, just different packages.
Thanks,
--
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
hat you are linking with. And that is the
real error here then.
The crash might be cause by you linking to the wrong libstdc++.so.
Is this the only "libstdc++.so*" on your system?
--
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
/msys/1.0/local/lib -lxslt -lxml2 -lz -lm'
Why does libtool not add the dependency_libs of a linked .la to
the parameters of the g++ command?
--
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 09:21:31PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> libtool --version?
$ libtool --version
ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.8 (1.1220.2.117 2004/08/04 14:12:05)
cvs doesn't compile on mingw.
--
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_
IN32.
Yes its HEAD - and the failure is early, in the libltdl code.
--
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 08:35:43AM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Carlo Wood wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 09:21:31PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> >
> >>libtool --version?
> >
> >
> >$ libtool --version
> >ltmain.sh (GNU libto
in the .dll. The .dll.a is 100% equivalent
to the .lib file that you'd be linking with under windows (and
could link with using gcc (on cygwin/mingw32) except that libtool
needs the extension .dll.a in order to recognize it.
--
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
s member of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but not [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then the moderator of lesstif
replies to everyone (including the CC-ed [EMAIL PROTECTED])
with a rejection. The solution would be to just reply to
the address in the 'From:'
essages to this list."
>
> Any questions or comments should be directed to the list administrator
> at:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ___
> Libtool mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&g
22 matches
Mail list logo
