Re: repetitive boiler plate -l's

2000-08-23 Thread Bjoern Fischer
On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 07:23:33AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Aug 23, 2000, Alex Hornby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Seeing as I did not specify these myself, perhaps we could make > > libtool insert only one copy :) > > No. Each library you linked with depends on those other librar

Re: dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64

2000-12-20 Thread Bjoern Fischer
Hello Albert, > dependent on nothing: > $ ldd libpng.so > libz.so.2 => (file not found) This is your problem. Your libpng.so is not self-contained. The run-time linker is not able to resolve all dependencies of your libpng.so. You may set LD_LIBRARY_PATH, but you definetly want to fix yo

Re: dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64

2000-12-20 Thread Bjoern Fischer
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 02:01:17PM -0500, Tom Kacvinsky wrote: > Huh? My experience (on Solaris) has been that if foo.so has an embedded RPATH > and the application bar uses foo.so and also has a RPATH, then the binary's > RPATH is used for shared lib lookups. If the RPATH of the binary does not

Re: dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64

2000-12-20 Thread Bjoern Fischer
> BTW, I posted the same message to comp.unix.solaris and it turns out > there is a solution. In my code below, I dlopen libz.so and then > libpng.so. This fails. libpng.so has a hard-coded dependency on > libz.so.2. So, if I dlopen libz.so.2 and then libpng.so, everything > works! Now, I don't th

Re: dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64

2000-12-20 Thread Bjoern Fischer
hat do *not* search the dlopened object RPATH: http://www.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE/~bfischer/dlopen-bug.tar.gz Bjoern Fischer -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- GCS d--(+) s++: a- C+++(-) UBOSI$ P+++(-) L---(++) !E W- N+ o>+ K- !w !O !M !V PS++ PE- PGP++ t+++ !5 X++ tv-