library_names_spec in ML branch for IRIX

ry_names='libz.so.2.0.0 libz.so libz.so' (IRIX) library_names='libz.so.3.0 libz.so.3 libz.so libz.so' Do we care? -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64

er engineer explain it to me one time, it's somewhat complex. Ok, that's what I meant. Thanks for the clarification. > They expect to change that behavior in the future, from what he said. Great! -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: Problems with test -L on Solaris

On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 01:19:03PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Albert Chin-A-Young writes: > > > Because of this, the following code snippet in ltmain.in will always > > fail (and thus 'make uninstall' will always fail on Solaris): > > # Don't error

Problems with test -L on Solaris

olic link (what 'test -L' does). Solaris /usr/bin/test accepts -L correctly. So, /bin/sh internal test is different from /usr/bin/test. -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

<    1   2   3   4