Re: [RFC] any critical patches for a release this weekend?

2014-11-02 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
[[Added back Cc: libtool-list]] > On Nov 1, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Richard PALO wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Le 27/10/14 23:02, Gary V. Vaughan a écrit : > | Hi Richard, > | > |> I'd like to see two patches committed: > |> > |> 1. the attached SunOS g++ shared libr

Re: bug#18910: GNU Libtool-2.4.3 released [stable]

2014-11-02 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Pavel, Sorry the lists are being slow this weekend :( > On Oct 30, 2014, at 1:06 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > Thanks for the release, Gary and all! > > On Monday 27 of October 2014 21:44:02 Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> - Fix a long-standing bug when using libtoolize without automake; we >> n

Re: [RFC] any critical patches for a release this weekend?

2014-11-02 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2014-11-02 11:42, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > [[Added back Cc: libtool-list]] > >> On Nov 1, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Richard PALO wrote: >> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Le 27/10/14 23:02, Gary V. Vaughan a écrit : >> | Hi Richard, >> | >> |> I'd like to see two patches com

Re: [RFC] any critical patches for a release this weekend?

2014-11-02 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, > On Nov 2, 2014, at 8:43 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > > On 2014-11-02 11:42, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> >> Sorry I didn't word my original reply more carefully. The stack-protector >> patch was a no-brainer, and as such is included in 2.4.3 already. >> >> Could you explain the other one

Re: [RFC] any critical patches for a release this weekend?

2014-11-02 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, > On Nov 2, 2014, at 8:43 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > > On 2014-11-02 11:42, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> >> Sorry I didn't word my original reply more carefully. The stack-protector >> patch was a no-brainer, and as such is included in 2.4.3 already. >> >> Could you explain the other one