Re: bfd and cygpath

2013-04-26 Thread NightStrike
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2013-04-24 22:24, NightStrike wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:16 PM, NightStrike wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: So, it appears that LT_PATH_LD does not like your ld? I'd look into that. >>> >>>

Re: bfd and cygpath

2013-04-26 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2013-04-26 13:58, NightStrike wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2013-04-24 22:24, NightStrike wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:16 PM, NightStrike wrote: On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > So, it appears that LT_PATH_LD does not

Re: bfd and cygpath

2013-04-26 Thread NightStrike
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2013-04-26 13:58, NightStrike wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> On 2013-04-24 22:24, NightStrike wrote: On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:16 PM, NightStrike wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Peter R

Re: bfd and cygpath

2013-04-26 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2013-04-26 18:51, NightStrike wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2013-04-26 13:58, NightStrike wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: On 2013-04-24 22:24, NightStrike wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:16 PM, NightStrike >

Re: bfd and cygpath

2013-04-26 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2013-04-26 23:48, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2013-04-26 18:51, NightStrike wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> You had LD=i686-w64-mingw32-gcc, which will not make libtool happy. You >>> might try LD=i686-w64-mingw32-ld instead, but you shouldn't need to >>> specify L