Hi Chuck,
I note that no other GNU projects that I'm aware of jump through all the
__declspec hoops that the libltdl API tries to provide through LT_SCOPE.
Is any of this stuff still required on any non-museum Windows compiler
that would break if I removed it?
Here's what I'm proposing to do for
Gary V. Vaughan skrev 2011-10-25 12:51:
> Hi Chuck,
>
> I note that no other GNU projects that I'm aware of jump through all the
> __declspec hoops that the libltdl API tries to provide through LT_SCOPE.
> Is any of this stuff still required on any non-museum Windows compiler
> that would break if
Hi Peter,
On 25 Oct 2011, at 18:12, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan skrev 2011-10-25 12:51:
>> I note that no other GNU projects that I'm aware of jump through all the
>> __declspec hoops that the libltdl API tries to provide through LT_SCOPE.
>> Is any of this stuff still required on any non
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Hi Chuck,
I note that no other GNU projects that I'm aware of jump through all the
__declspec hoops that the libltdl API tries to provide through LT_SCOPE.
Is any of this stuff still required on any non-museum Windows compiler
that would break if I re
On 10/25/2011 6:51 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Do you forsee any issues on Windows with my doing that?
Yes.
> I'm almost certain that modern gcc and hence cygwin and variants will
> continue to work correctly without LT_SCOPE, LTDL_DLL_IMPORT and friends,
> but I have no clue whether vendor com
Bob Friesenhahn skrev 2011-10-25 16:00:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>
>> Hi Chuck,
>>
>> I note that no other GNU projects that I'm aware of jump through all the
>> __declspec hoops that the libltdl API tries to provide through LT_SCOPE.
>> Is any of this stuff still required on
Gary V. Vaughan skrev 2011-10-25 14:17:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 25 Oct 2011, at 18:12, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Gary V. Vaughan skrev 2011-10-25 12:51:
>>> I note that no other GNU projects that I'm aware of jump through all the
>>> __declspec hoops that the libltdl API tries to provide through LT_SCOPE.
On 10/25/2011 11:03 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan skrev 2011-10-25 14:17:
> I configures both the way I usually configure libtool for msvc, i.e.
>
> ../configure autobuild_mode=msvc CC="/c/cygwin/home/peda/automake/lib/compile
> cl" CFLAGS="-MD -Zi -EHsc" CXX="/c/cygwin/home/peda/autom
Hi Peter, Bob, Chuck,
Thanks all for the feedback.
And Peter especially for running the torturous testsuites on Windows :)
On 25 Oct 2011, at 21:34, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Bob Friesenhahn skrev 2011-10-25 16:00:
>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>> I note that no other GNU projects
I should also add:
On 25 Oct 2011, at 21:34, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Bob Friesenhahn skrev 2011-10-25 16:00:
>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>> I note that no other GNU projects that I'm aware of jump through all the
>>> __declspec hoops that the libltdl API tries to provide through L
Gary V. Vaughan skrev 2011-10-25 18:07:
> I should also add:
>
> On 25 Oct 2011, at 21:34, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Bob Friesenhahn skrev 2011-10-25 16:00:
>>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I note that no other GNU projects that I'm aware of jump through all the
__declspec hoo
Charles Wilson skrev 2011-10-25 17:34:
> On 10/25/2011 11:03 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Gary V. Vaughan skrev 2011-10-25 14:17:
>> I configures both the way I usually configure libtool for msvc, i.e.
>>
>> ../configure autobuild_mode=msvc
>> CC="/c/cygwin/home/peda/automake/lib/compile cl" CFLAGS="
Hi Gary,
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Hi Chuck,
I note that no other GNU projects that I'm aware of jump through all the
__declspec hoops that the libltdl API tries to provide through LT_SCOPE.
Is any of this stuff still required on any non-museum Windows compiler
that would break if I removed it?
[]
On 10/25/2011 11:51 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I have to bow to your superior knowledge of Windows, which I haven't used
for development since Windows NT 4, but it feels weird that Libltdl really
does twist itself into a pretzel for Windows... and yet all the other GNU
projects I've looked at do
14 matches
Mail list logo
