On 6/17/2011 2:10 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
Yes, sorry, I keep forgetting about auto-import feature, I guess I'm just
too accustomed to the "traditional" Windows way and have trouble
accepting
auto-import magic. It's true that projects using auto-impor
On 2011-06-17 Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 6/16/2011 2:50 PM, Lasse Collin wrote:
> > Major:minor:revision is easier to understand than
> > current:revision:age,
>
> Major:minor:revision artificially entangles package release numbering
> with API/ABI changes. Typically when one 'goes up' so does th
Den 2011-06-17 01:15 skrev Bob Friesenhahn:
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
>> BF>
>> BF> In what way was libtool specifically requested to build a DLL?
>>
>> I'm not sure about the details (please keep in mind that we're speaking
>> about libxml2 here and not my own project) but config
On 6/17/2011 5:26 AM, Lasse Collin wrote:
> At that point, Debian had bumped major to 2. Other distros might have
> had other versions. If I had tracked the ABI breakages in development
> versions, current in -version-info would now be close to a three-digit
> number. Probably I wouldn't have re
On 6/17/2011 3:46 AM, Marco atzeri wrote:
> on cygwin
>
> "lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all"
>
> is my workaround at configure stage to bypass incorrect
> libtool detection of system capabilities and to allow
> shared libs building.
It's not about "system capabilities" in this case. It's abou
On 6/17/2011 4:14 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 6/17/2011 3:46 AM, Marco atzeri wrote:
on cygwin
"lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all"
is my workaround at configure stage to bypass incorrect
libtool detection of system capabilities and to allow
shared libs building.
It's not about "system cap
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:10:39 -0500 (CDT) Bob Friesenhahn
wrote:
BF> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
BF> >
BF> > Yes, sorry, I keep forgetting about auto-import feature, I guess I'm just
BF> > too accustomed to the "traditional" Windows way and have trouble accepting
BF> > auto-import m
On 6/17/2011 11:03 AM, Marco atzeri wrote:
> Sorry Chuck,
> but I can assure you that I am linking against shared dlls,
> but the detection is incorrect.
Well, then that's a bug. Can you give an example of a foo.a, foo.dll.a,
and foo-N.dll (plus the -lfoo incantation) you're using for which the
de
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 15:16:36
From: Jan Engelhardt
To: bug-libt...@gnu.org
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik, Peter Volkov
Subject: rpath encoded in binary linking a .la-.so file
On Tuesday 2011-05-24 15:01, Peter Volkov wrote via private mail:
>
>>>Final ipset binary
