El jue, 17-03-2011 a las 15:47 -0700, Dan Nicholson escribió:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > Downstream on Gentoo we see some package having problems at "make
> > install" phase using -j2 or more. Reporting to upstream, some of them
> > told us that they th
Hello Pacho,
* Pacho Ramos wrote on Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:48:51AM CET:
> We have some downstream opened bugs with similar cases, would you mind
> asking for help with them here in the future once their respective
> upstream refuse to fix the issues?
Feel free to come to this mailing list for he
Pacho,
hope you're reading the list. Mail from me to you bounces because some
MTA near your end is over-eagerly using SPF to reject legitimate mail.
Rakf
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 08:43:21PM CET:
> Hello Pacho,
>
> * Pacho Ramos wrote on Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:48:51AM CE
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Ralf Wildenhues
wrote:
> * Dan Nicholson wrote on Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:47:38PM CET:
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>
>> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644896#c2
>>
>> This seems more legitimate. I looked at the Makefile.a
Since gcc 4.6.0 it is no longer possible to use LDFLAGS=-no-undefined
gcc now says something like this:
gcc.exe: error: unrecognized option '-no-undefined'
Before 4.6.0 it was possible to do that, and gcc said only this:
gcc.exe: unrecognized option '-no-undefined'
That is, unrecognized option was
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, LRN wrote:
Since gcc 4.6.0 it is no longer possible to use LDFLAGS=-no-undefined
gcc now says something like this:
gcc.exe: error: unrecognized option '-no-undefined'
Before 4.6.0 it was possible to do that, and gcc said only this:
gcc.exe: unrecognized option '-no-undefin
On 18.03.2011 23:51, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, LRN wrote:
Since gcc 4.6.0 it is no longer possible to use LDFLAGS=-no-undefined
gcc now says something like this:
gcc.exe: error: unrecognized option '-no-undefined'
Before 4.6.0 it was possible to do that, and gcc said only this
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, LRN wrote:
On 18.03.2011 23:51, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, LRN wrote:
Since gcc 4.6.0 it is no longer possible to use LDFLAGS=-no-undefined
gcc now says something like this:
gcc.exe: error: unrecognized option '-no-undefined'
Before 4.6.0 it was possibl
