On 01/21/11 17:48, Robert Boehne wrote:
> Michael,
> The "-brtl" isn't a "run-time linking" flag, but more exactly, it's a
> system-5 shared library compatibility mode flag.
> It is intended to provide a more familiar shared library style, not
> additional features.
As far as I can tell, runti
On 01/22/11 17:41, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> On 01/21/2011 08:19 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>> Hello!
>
> Hi.
>
> Library versioning for AIX would be a great feature.
>
>>
>> After playing around with different ways[1], this is my proposed one,
>> using an AIX feature called "Import Files":
2011/1/24 Ralf Wildenhues
> Hello Sergio,
>
> * Sergio Belkin wrote on Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 11:13:16PM CET:
> > I've found great the option "-no-install". But I wonder if is there a
> > way to build directly the executables files, I mean that don't create
> > object file "something.o" and only do
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 07:42:25AM -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> 2011/1/24 Ralf Wildenhues
>
> > Hello Sergio,
> >
> > * Sergio Belkin wrote on Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 11:13:16PM CET:
> > > I've found great the option "-no-install". But I wonder if is there a
> > > way to build directly the executab
On 01/23/11 07:31, Daniel Sands wrote:
The reasons to choose this way:
*) It is possible to dlopen() with or without a version number:
- dlopen("libNAME.so(shr.o)", RTLD_MEMBER), besides the preferred
- dlopen("libNAME.so.1(shr.o)", RTLD_MEMBER), and even
* Sergio Belkin wrote on Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:42:25AM CET:
> Let's say that you have a library libfoo.so and you have on build tree a
> source file fred.c. You've created a test target that creat (with
> -no-install flag) the ELF executable fred (note that has no extension).
> But libtool cre
