Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable]

2010-10-01 Thread Paolo Bonzini
> package1: ./configure > package1: make install DESTDIR=/tmp/root1 > > package2: ./configure > package2: make install DESTDIR=/tmp/root2 > > 1. No need to update existing builds, adding --with-sysroot to all > configure statements is harder. Hardly impossible though. > 2. You can assume DESTDIR

Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable]

2010-10-01 Thread Charles Wilson
On 10/1/2010 2:23 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > I wanted to see the process this way... > > export SYSROOT=/tmp/root1 > > package1: ./configure > package1: make install DESTDIR=/tmp/root1 > > package2: ./configure > package2: make install DESTDIR=/tmp/root2 What you are missing is that "sysroot" is

Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable]

2010-10-01 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: > Please, over the past three months there were hundreds of messages > discussing sysroot and how it shoold be handled.  While libtool's > support is not yet complete, what IS there is the result of those > discussions.  Please read them; I hav

Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable]

2010-10-01 Thread Charles Wilson
On 10/1/2010 4:22 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Charles Wilson > wrote: ^^^ >> Please, over the past three months there were hundreds of messages >> discussing sysroot and how it shoold be handled. While libtool's >> support is not yet c

Re: libtool 2.2.10: What is the correct library naming convention

2010-10-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Joost, * Joost Kraaijeveld wrote on Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:46:09PM CEST: > I have asked this question before, but I got no answer. If I asked it > the wrong or impolite way: sorry and please forgive me. No, it's simply that we don't have the manpower to address all bug reports in a timely