Hi Gary,
Den 2010-09-19 06:03 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
> I'm planning to make the belated 2.4 release in about 24 hours.
Just a friendly ping, but only just now I pushed a change to the
'compile' script in automake and would like the new version in
the release if it's not too much to ask for. Than
On 9/20/2010 1:41 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I'd really appreciate if you guys could send build logs to the autobuild
> server...
> Here's what I use, more or less, to create the logs:
>
> ( ../libtool/configure [OPTIONS] \
> && make \
> && make -k check
> cat test-suite.log tests/
Peter Rosin wrote:
> Just a friendly ping, but only just now I pushed a change to the
> 'compile' script in automake and would like the new version in
> the release if it's not too much to ask for. Thanks!
Errr...is that kosher? I thought libtool was only supposed to ship the
scripts provided by
Hi Chuck, Peter, Automakers,
On 22 Sep 2010, at 05:02, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Just a friendly ping, but only just now I pushed a change to the
>> 'compile' script in automake and would like the new version in
>> the release if it's not too much to ask for. Thanks!
>
> Errr
On 9/21/2010 9:21 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> I don't recall having done so in a while but, according to bootstrap:
>
> # It is okay for the bootstrap process to require unreleased autoconf
> # or automake, as long as any released libtool will work with at least
> # the newest stable versions of
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 03:21:55AM CEST:
> On 22 Sep 2010, at 05:02, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > Peter Rosin wrote:
> >> Just a friendly ping, but only just now I pushed a change to the
> >> 'compile' script in automake and would like the new version in
> >> the release if it'
* Charles Wilson wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:10:39AM CEST:
> On 9/20/2010 1:41 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > I'd really appreciate if you guys could send build logs to the autobuild
> > server...
> > Here's what I use, more or less, to create the logs:
> See, that's what was missing. You ha
On 22 Sep 2010, at 11:29, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> You should not need to use git Automake for this, and please don't,
> because it currently carries a small regression over 1.11.1.
Ah, okay. If it was taken care of by fetch already, then there was
no need for Peter to ping me :)
Thanks for the
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 06:42:53AM CEST:
>
> On 22 Sep 2010, at 11:29, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > You should not need to use git Automake for this, and please don't,
> > because it currently carries a small regression over 1.11.1.
>
> Ah, okay. If it was taken care of by
