Re: libtool versioning

2010-05-06 Thread Jason Curl
Hi Ralf & Bob, On 03/05/2010 19:58, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello, * Matěj Týč wrote on Mon, May 03, 2010 at 05:45:26PM CEST: If I have understood correctly, the whole LTversion stuff has only one purpose - to inform users what have they installed. Wrong. It provides a fairly porta

Re: libtool versioning

2010-05-06 Thread Jason Curl
On 04/05/2010 20:41, Peter Rosin wrote: Den 2010-05-04 20:00 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: Errrm, is that really so? I tend to agree with Jef here... I take it that your response is to my "... it will work" sentence, not the paragraph below that. Ah, indeed. The algorithm *could* be interpreted su

Re: libtool versioning

2010-05-06 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-05-06 19:45 skrev Jason Curl: On 04/05/2010 20:41, Peter Rosin wrote: Den 2010-05-04 20:00 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: Ah, ok. Yes, you're right. Feel free to commit a patch to s/removed/& or changed/ in 6. Sorry I came in late for the discussion. Is it correct to interpret "removed" as an