On 02/05/10 03:33, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Jef Driesen wrote:
I'm trying to understand the libtool current:revision:age versioning scheme.
I think I understand how it works, but I noticed that filename of the shared
library seems to get different numbers (current-age.age.revi
>> I'm trying to understand the libtool current:revision:age versioning
>> scheme. I think I understand how it works, but I noticed that filename of
>> the shared library seems to get different numbers
>> (current-age.age.revision). Is that expected?
>
> The filename generation is dependent on the
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Jef Driesen wrote:
# 6. If any interfaces have been removed since the last public release,
# then set age to 0.
Shouldn't step #6 included "changed" as well as "removed"? If you change the
interface (for example modifying function parameters), backwards
compatibility
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Matěj Týč wrote:
If I have understood correctly, the whole LTversion stuff has only one
purpose - to inform users what have they installed.
More specifically, it provides libtool with the information needed to
produce a suitably numbered library to satisfy a purpose
On 3 May 2010, at 23:09, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Mon, 3 May 2010, Matěj Týč wrote:
>>>
>>
>> If I have understood correctly, the whole LTversion stuff has only one
>> purpose - to inform users what have they installed.
>
> More specifically, it provides libtool with the information need
Hello Jef,
* Jef Driesen wrote on Mon, May 03, 2010 at 09:08:14AM CEST:
> On 02/05/10 03:33, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> >On Sun, 2 May 2010, Jef Driesen wrote:
> >
> >>I'm trying to understand the libtool current:revision:age versioning scheme.
> >>I think I understand how it works, but I noticed th
Hello,
* Matěj Týč wrote on Mon, May 03, 2010 at 05:45:26PM CEST:
> If I have understood correctly, the whole LTversion stuff has only one
> purpose - to inform users what have they installed.
Wrong. It provides a fairly portable abstraction of different
versioning schemes implemented in differ
On 03/05/10 20:00, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Jef,
* Jef Driesen wrote on Mon, May 03, 2010 at 09:08:14AM CEST:
On 02/05/10 03:33, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Jef Driesen wrote:
I'm trying to understand the libtool current:revision:age versioning scheme.
I think I understand
* Jef Driesen wrote on Mon, May 03, 2010 at 08:24:09PM CEST:
> Yes, I have read the libtool manual, but it doesn't contain much
> info about the resulting filename. Most of the info is about the
> c:r:a scheme for input, not the output.
Yes, because the output file name is a per-system detail that
Jef Driesen - Mon, 03 May 2010 20:24:09 +0200
>On 03/05/10 20:00, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> Hello Jef,
>>
>> * Jef Driesen wrote on Mon, May 03, 2010 at 09:08:14AM CEST:
>>> On 02/05/10 03:33, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Jef Driesen wrote:
>> The git master version of Libtoo
10 matches
Mail list logo
