Re: purpose of the c wrapper

2009-06-04 Thread Roumen Petrov
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Vincent, Bob, [SNIP] But anyway, I don't see how the current git code generates C wrappers for wince. The host is usually xxx-mingw32ce and will match patterns like {*-}*-mingw*, i.e. it will generate wrappers as for mingw32. But the C-wrapper-code of current

Re: purpose of the c wrapper

2009-06-04 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Vincent, * Vincent Torri wrote on Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:32:50PM CEST: >> >> Does there exist a simulator for wince? Even if not now, can there >> exist one at some point? In that case, we should strive to not make >> things harder for that setup. > > there is a simulator for Windows CE t

Re: d3dx9.lib is not managed by ld, but libd3dx9.a is

2009-06-04 Thread Roumen Petrov
Vincent Torri wrote: Hey, I'm writing a dll using D3D and autotools stuff (MSYS / MinGW). I pass -ld3dx9 and i have added everything so that the dll is built. If I add from the DirectX SDK d3dx9.lib in /mingw/lib, i have the usual warning message from linker / libtool: *** Warning: linker

Re: purpose of the c wrapper

2009-06-04 Thread Vincent Torri
Hey, * Vincent Torri wrote on Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:32:50PM CEST: Does there exist a simulator for wince? Even if not now, can there exist one at some point? In that case, we should strive to not make things harder for that setup. there is a simulator for Windows CE that can be run on l

Re: purpose of the c wrapper

2009-06-04 Thread Vincent Torri
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Roumen Petrov wrote: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Vincent, Bob, [SNIP] But anyway, I don't see how the current git code generates C wrappers for wince. The host is usually xxx-mingw32ce and will match patterns like {*-}*-mingw*, i.e. it will generate wrappers as for

Re: purpose of the c wrapper

2009-06-04 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Charles, * Charles Wilson wrote on Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 04:20:12AM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > (On most w32 systems, > > a script without an .exe extension would match such a rule as well, but > > that's not the case for example on GNU/Linux -> w32 cross compiles and > > with some weird