Re: Linking just some static

* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:56:39AM CET: > On Monday 2009-02-16 19:56, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > > >Can you try out the patch, and report back? > > It works, but does not yet deal with some cases. >

Re: Linking just some static

On Monday 2009-02-23 10:45, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >[...] >So it's back to the drawing and testing board for the patch. One of >the problems is that >- for the "prefer one type of library but not the other" we might have > to drop the switches for libraries which don't match, >- for the "require

ltdl weirdness

Hello all, I am using libltdl in my project and I experience some unexpected things. First of all, if I have some undefined references in my module, the module can't be loaded using lt_dlopen neither using its ext variant. The reason for that is stated as "could not find the file", but this is not

Re: ltdl weirdness

On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Matj Tý wrote: Hello all, I am using libltdl in my project and I experience some unexpected things. First of all, if I have some undefined references in my module, the module can't be loaded using lt_dlopen neither using its ext variant. The reason for that is stated as "c

Re: cmdline_wrap.at

Hi Ralf, On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Tim, > > * Tim Rice wrote on Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 09:29:40PM CET: > > > > I'm trying to understand the cmdline_wrap.at test. > > I've added this patch to fix the 2 template tests that were failing > > on UnixWare 7.1.4 > > Can you post