Re: FreeWRL plugin, libtool problem

2009-02-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Michel, * Michel Briand wrote on Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:34:41PM CET: > > > >I've a grave problem : when I build my Debian package the libtool > >install mode was not called. In the resulting package > >the /usr/bin/freewrl is not the real binary : > > > >/usr/bin/freewrl: error: `/usr/bin/.

Re: Linking just some static

2009-02-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Jan, * Jan Engelhardt wrote on Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 02:10:28AM CET: > > is it somehow possible to specify that only a given set of libraries is > supposed to be linked in statically into a program? Something along the > lines of... > > bin_PROGRAMS = foo bar > foo_LDADD = libabc.la -( -stat

Re: Linking just some static

2009-02-16 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Monday 2009-02-16 19:56, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> >> is it somehow possible to specify that only a given set of libraries is >> supposed to be linked in statically into a program? Something along the >> lines of... >> >> bin_PROGRAMS = foo bar >> foo_LDADD = libabc.la -( -static libdef.la

Re: Linking just some static

2009-02-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 08:36:00PM CET: > On Monday 2009-02-16 19:56, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > > >Can you try out the patch, and report back? > > Hm, how do I extract it from there without mark-cop

Re: Linking just some static

2009-02-16 Thread Jan Engelhardt
Hi Ralf, On Monday 2009-02-16 19:56, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> >> is it somehow possible to specify that only a given set of libraries is >> supposed to be linked in statically into a program? Something along the >> lines of... >> >> bin_PROGRAMS = foo bar >> foo_LDADD = libabc.la -( -static