Re: Getting filenames for libraries

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Jason, * Jason Curl wrote on Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 08:43:35PM CET: I can't move over to libtool 2.2.x just yet (most distros I support still have 1.5.26 - sorry) and I'm generating libraries. FWIW, most distros have a way to use upstream packages without r

Re: Getting filenames for libraries

Jason Curl wrote: > >> I can't move over to libtool 2.2.x just yet (most distros I support > >> still have 1.5.26 - sorry) and I'm generating libraries. > >> > > > > FWIW, most distros have a way to use upstream packages without > > re-libtoolizing and re-autoreconfing them. > > > I'm using Ubuntu

Re: Getting filenames for libraries

Brian Dessent wrote: Jason Curl wrote: I can't move over to libtool 2.2.x just yet (most distros I support still have 1.5.26 - sorry) and I'm generating libraries. FWIW, most distros have a way to use upstream packages without re-libtoolizing and re-autoreconfing them. I'

Re: Getting filenames for libraries

Jason Curl wrote: Brian Dessent wrote: Jason Curl wrote: [SNIP] I've attached a sample of the macros if there are comments. e.g. configure.ac (only the interesting bits) [SNIP] LX_PROG_RC use AC_LIBTOOL_RC AC_CONFIG_FILES([src/rsrc.rc]) Makefile.am [SNIP] .rc.lo: $(LIBTOOL) $(AM_