Hello,
The Guile project is considering moving from Libtool 1.5 to 2.2. We
noticed subtle incompatibilities when people tried to compile Guile
tarballs (which use Libtool 1.5 up to now) with from Libtool
2.2 [0].
The question now is: will people be able to build tarballs that come
with Libtool
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I doubt that the version Ralf tested is dramatically faster than the
already released libtool 2.2.6. There is a point of diminishing
returns.
Actually, current git has a few more improvements, and I have a couple
more in mind. I haven't measure the
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
The question now is: will people be able to build tarballs that come
with Libtool 2.2 with from Libtool 1.5?
I don't think there was ever any intention for libtool 2.2.X to work
with libltdl from libtool 1.5.X. If libltdl is not bundled with the
Hi,
Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>
>> The question now is: will people be able to build tarballs that come
>> with Libtool 2.2 with from Libtool 1.5?
>
> I don't think there was ever any intention for libtool 2.2.X to work
> with libl
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
I don't think there was ever any intention for libtool 2.2.X to work
with libltdl from libtool 1.5.X. If libltdl is not bundled with the
package, then it should be possible to use an already installed
libltdl from libtool 1.5.X.
What do you mean exac
Hello Ludovic,
* Ludovic Courtès wrote on Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 09:38:53AM CET:
> The Guile project is considering moving from Libtool 1.5 to 2.2. We
> noticed subtle incompatibilities when people tried to compile Guile
> tarballs (which use Libtool 1.5 up to now) with from Libtool
> 2.2 [0].
>
