Re: libtool windows dll suffix revision

2008-03-15 Thread Peter Rosin
Alon Bar-Lev skrev: Hello, I appreciate any reply regarding this. The win32 build is supported in 2.2 series, and this issue remains. Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. On 3/9/08, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, Please CC me as I am not subscribed. Was something in the following discus

Re: libtool windows dll suffix revision

2008-03-15 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 3/15/08, Peter Rosin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With your suggestion of always using age, you would get dll-7.dll and > dll-8.dll for your examples, but you would also get dll-7.dll for my > example, and then you would have the same file name for two incompatible > dlls, which is a lot wors

Re: libtool windows dll suffix revision

2008-03-15 Thread Roumen Petrov
Alon Bar-Lev wrote: On 3/15/08, Peter Rosin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: With your suggestion of always using age, you would get dll-7.dll and dll-8.dll for your examples, but you would also get dll-7.dll for my example, and then you would have the same file name for two incompatible dlls, whic