On 9/30/07, Benoit SIGOURE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> several GNU projects (including autoconf) have moved to Git, is there
Just curious... why git over svn?
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
On Oct 1, 2007, at 8:59 AM, NightStrike wrote:
On 9/30/07, Benoit SIGOURE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
several GNU projects (including autoconf) have moved to Git, is there
Just curious... why git over svn?
Instead of going in lengthy threads, I think you should simply read
these thr
On Oct 1, 2007, at 2:54 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Benoit SIGOURE wrote:
Hello,
several GNU projects (including autoconf) have moved to Git, is
there any similar plan for automake and libtool? Is anyone in
charge of this? Help needed?
I think that the current prior
Hi together!
I have a question about relinking. I'm porting libtool 1.5.24 to a
compiler which uses microsoft's cl.exe in the background. I have all
libtool tests passing right now.
Still i feel, that relinking should not be neccessary with my compiler
(it supports hardcoding correctly, LD_LIBRAR
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Benoit SIGOURE wrote:
I think that the current priority for libtool *must* be to finish the first
2.X release. Any distraction (regardless of apparent merit) will simply
postpone that release even further.
Yes, that's right. When will this happen? Is there a TODO list o
Hello Markus,
* Duft Markus wrote on Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 01:55:55PM CEST:
>
> Still i feel, that relinking should not be neccessary with my compiler
[...]
> Is there any other way to tell libtool, that it should not relink, which
> does not break anything else.
AFAIR we fixed that in CVS HEAD,
