normal ltdl linking suggestions?

2007-07-09 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Hi, the libtool info document has several suggestions how to link with libltdl. but they all imply to include the ltdl source in my projects source, and I don't want to do that. Also with most distributions shipping ltdl as a normal library with devel and runtime package, I see no reason for that,

Re: normal ltdl linking suggestions?

2007-07-09 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hallo Andreas, On Jul 9, 2007, at 4:49 AM, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: the libtool info document has several suggestions how to link with libltdl. but they all imply to include the ltdl source in my projects source, and I don't want to do that. Also with most distributions shipping ltdl as a

Library order in gcc command

2007-07-09 Thread Arvid Brodin
I am doing a test installation of GTK+ on top of DirectFB (instead of on X11). (I'm later going to cross compile this for an embedded system.) Now, GTK+ depends on Cairo, and Cairo in turn is compiled with support for either X11 or DirectFB as graphics backend. I'm installing everything to a sep

building libtool in MinGW

2007-07-09 Thread S James S Stapleton
Please cc me a copy of any replies as I am not on the list. Thank you. I downloaded the latest MinGW friday, and libtool's source today, both from stable: MinGW 5.1.3 installer libtool-1.9f I cannot get libtool to compile (I need it for OpenSSL I think), during the make process I get an err

Re: Library order in gcc command

2007-07-09 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 14:44 +0200, Arvid Brodin wrote: > I am doing a test installation of GTK+ on top of DirectFB (instead of on > X11). (I'm later going to cross compile this for an embedded system.) Now, > GTK+ depends on Cairo, and Cairo in turn is compiled with support for either > X11 or D

Re: building libtool in MinGW

2007-07-09 Thread Noah Misch
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 10:40:57AM -0400, S James S Stapleton wrote: > libtool-1.9f This alpha release is dated. However, current CVS is broken on MinGW. I would check out CVS from a month ago or use the latest 1.5 release. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /c/Documents and Settings/stapleton.41/My > Docume

Re: building libtool in MinGW

2007-07-09 Thread S James S Stapleton
Thank you, -Jim Stapleton - Original Message - From: "Noah Misch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "S James S Stapleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 1:43 PM Subject: Re: building libtool in MinGW On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 10:40:57AM -0400, S James S Stapleton wrote: l

Re: building libtool in MinGW

2007-07-09 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Noah Misch wrote: On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 10:40:57AM -0400, S James S Stapleton wrote: libtool-1.9f This alpha release is dated. However, current CVS is broken on MinGW. I would check out CVS from a month ago or use the latest 1.5 release. This is the current breakage

Re: normal ltdl linking suggestions?

2007-07-09 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Hi Gary, On Monday 09 July 2007 17:47:13 Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > All the world is not Linux. By not shipping libltdl at all, you're > making life difficult for the users of hundreds of other platforms who will > have to install their own libltdl just to build your package, which many > will lik

Re: normal ltdl linking suggestions?

2007-07-09 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: Hi Gary, On Monday 09 July 2007 17:47:13 Gary V. Vaughan wrote: All the world is not Linux. By not shipping libltdl at all, you're making life difficult for the users of hundreds of other platforms who will have to install their own libltdl just

Re: normal ltdl linking suggestions?

2007-07-09 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello, * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 10:54:34PM CEST: > On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > >On Monday 09 July 2007 17:47:13 Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > >>All the world is not Linux. By not shipping libltdl at all, you're > >>making life difficult for the users of hund