Hello Brendon,
* Brendon Costa wrote on Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 03:53:12AM CEST:
>
> I am having troubles linking an application in a project that uses
> libtool in an environment that has two versions of the GCC compiler.
[...]
>
> When i want to build using the development GCC i do the following:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 04:30:00PM CEST:
> On 29 Mar 2007, at 18:11, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >I'd welcome you to do to Libtool what you did to Autoconf
> >some years ago.
>
> Rewrite the guts of it in Perl? Ai-ya! /me runs and hides.
No, I meant "generally improve it".
Ok, I installed libtool 1.5.23b and re-bootstrapped my example project.
I have since changed the place where GCC 4.0.1 is installed to avoid
confusion with my modified version:
GCC 3.3.3 prefix: /usr/
GCC 4.0.1 prefix: /home/bcosta/gcc/install/
set the environment variables:
export PATH=/home/bc
* Brendon Costa wrote on Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 11:42:29PM CEST:
> Ok, I installed libtool 1.5.23b and re-bootstrapped my example project.
Thanks for all the data. Upon reading, I'm a bit embarassed to see that
I could have asked a better question earlier; sorry about that.
> /usr/pkg/bin/bash ../
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Brendon Costa wrote on Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 11:42:29PM CEST:
>> Ok, I installed libtool 1.5.23b and re-bootstrapped my example project.
>
> Thanks for all the data. Upon reading, I'm a bit embarassed to see that
> I could have asked a better question earlier; sorry abou
* Brendon Costa wrote on Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:21:05AM CEST:
>
> They are both C++ libraries yes. I do not tell either of them to link
> with libstdc++ explicitly. The linking lines for the libs are below.
Libtool gets the libstdc++ part in, for g++.
> There is no mention of libstdc++ in the l
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Brendon Costa wrote on Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:21:05AM CEST:
>> They are both C++ libraries yes. I do not tell either of them to link
>> with libstdc++ explicitly. The linking lines for the libs are below.
>
> Libtool gets the libstdc++ part in, for g++.
>
>> There is n
