Re: library versioning problem

2007-03-26 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Lucien, On 25 Mar 2007, at 16:50, Lucien GENTIS wrote: That means: CURRENT is replaced by CURRENT - AGE (69 - 38 = 31) REVISION is replaced by AGE AGE is replaced by REVISION http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual.html#Libtool-versioning Cheers, Gary -- ())_.

Re: [RFC] New library "type" needed?

2007-03-26 Thread Bernd Jendrissek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 03:42:54PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: > but why would you ever want to build libbfd shared? It is always > built static by default even on ELF systems Hmm, not on my system. It's shared here. And a good thing too, as I don'

Re: {SPAM 03.3} Re: library versioning problem

2007-03-26 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Lucien, Please keep the relevant lists in the Cc: list for the benefit of other users experiencing the same problem. On 26 Mar 2007, at 12:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 25 Mar 2007, at 16:50, Lucien GENTIS wrote: That means: CURRENT is repla

Re: [RFC] New library "type" needed?

2007-03-26 Thread Charles Wilson
Charles Wilson wrote: I completely understand the motivation for the meat of this, speaking in the hypothetical sense, but why would you ever want to build libbfd shared? I did --enable-shared at the top level, and bfd is the first one that failed. I'm really more interested in the runtime li

Re: [RFC] New library "type" needed?

2007-03-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Charles, Here's a review based on the question how such a concept could be expressed portably. I don't see how something like this would be of great help if it could not be made to gracefully decay into something still usable, on at least a useful set of platforms if not all of them. * Cha

Re: [cygwin] Analysis for new testsuite failures 33,34.35

2007-03-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Charles, Thanks for the bug report. * Charles Wilson wrote on Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 07:32:12AM CET: > > ../../libtool-HEAD/tests/subproject.at:56: $MAKE all $tst_dist > + make all dist [...] > mkdir: cannot create directory > `/usr/src/libtool/cvs/_build/tests/testsuite.dir/33/subproject-demo

Re: Support for VC++ toolchain (was Re: Absolute paths generatedbylibtool.)

2007-03-26 Thread Olly Betts
On 2006-11-28, Duft Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you could tell me how i can bring outlook to do so, i will gladly ;o) Off-topic, but in the interests of improving the readability of this list (and others!): Outlook: http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/ Outlook Expre

Re: [cygwin] Analysis for new testsuite failures 33,34.35

2007-03-26 Thread libtool
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:39:24 +0200, "Ralf Wildenhues" said: > Hi Charles, > > Thanks for the bug report. > > * Charles Wilson wrote on Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 07:32:12AM CET: > > > > ../../libtool-HEAD/tests/subproject.at:56: $MAKE all $tst_dist > > + make all dist > [...] > > mkdir: cannot create

Re: [cygwin] Analysis for new testsuite failures 33,34.35

2007-03-26 Thread Charles Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:39:24 +0200, "Ralf Wildenhues" said: AFAICS, this can only happen if libltdl was treated with automake-1.9 and the tests run with automake-1.10 in place, so that the toplevel package (named subproject-demo-2.1a) is treated with 1.10. I'm not so

RE: Support for VC++ toolchain (was Re: Absolute pathsgeneratedbylibtool.)

2007-03-26 Thread Duft Markus
Olly Betts <> wrote: > On 2006-11-28, Duft Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If you could tell me how i can bring outlook to do so, i will gladly >> ;o) > > Off-topic, but in the interests of improving the readability of this > list (and others!): > > Outlook: > > http://home.in.tum.de/~jain