Hello Bruno, Eric,
* Eric Blake wrote on Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 06:55:53AM CET:
> According to Bruno Haible on 11/1/2006 1:07 PM:
> >
> > When I invoke "./bootstrap -p no" in the savannah m4 CVS (HEAD), I get
> > finally
[...]
> > autoreconf: running: autoconf --force
> > configure:5222: error: po
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> - Install Libtool. Fix your $automake_prefix/share/aclocal/dirlist file
> so that aclocal finds libtool's files, and $PATH so that it contains
> libtoolize. CVS Libtool has means in place to tell apart version
> inconsistencies.
>
> I'm not in favor of merging libt
* Bruno Haible wrote on Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 02:20:31PM CET:
>
> # This script bootstraps a CVS checkout of GNU M4 by correctly
> # calling out to parts of the GNU Build Platform. Currently this
> ! # requires GNU Autoconf 2.60, GNU Automake 1.9.6, GNU Libtool 1.5.22
IIRC CVS HEAD M4 does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 11/2/2006 6:20 AM:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> - Install Libtool. Fix your $automake_prefix/share/aclocal/dirlist file
>> so that aclocal finds libtool's files, and $PATH so that it contains
>> libtoolize. CVS Libtool
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Ralf Wildenhues on 11/2/2006 6:33 AM:
Hi Ralf, Bruno,
>> ! # (either installed with the same --prefix as Automake, or made accessible
>> ! # to aclocal's search path through $AUTOMAKE_PREFIX/share/aclocal/dirlist),
>> ! # and bleeding ed
* Eric Blake wrote on Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 02:41:41PM CET:
> According to Ralf Wildenhues on 11/2/2006 6:33 AM:
> > By the way, M4's bootstrap script could just as well invoke
> > libtoolize --ltdl=ltdl --install --copy --force
> At one point, it did. But I wondered why we were invoking libtool
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Ralf Wildenhues on 11/2/2006 6:56 AM:
Hi Ralf,
>
>> At one point, it did. But I wondered why we were invoking libtoolize
>> prior to autoreconf, when autoreconf reinvokes libtoolize, and patches
>> were made to libtoolize and autoconf
* Eric Blake wrote on Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 03:20:22PM CET:
> According to Ralf Wildenhues on 11/2/2006 6:56 AM:
> >
> >> At one point, it did. But I wondered why we were invoking libtoolize
> >> prior to autoreconf, when autoreconf reinvokes libtoolize, and patches
> >> were made to libtoolize an
I'm working on cleaning up various aspects of the LSB compiler tools,
which are in fact wrappers around gcc. We've had a couple of bug
reports describing various ways that lsbcc and libtool interact badly.
Lsbcc basically exists to assist developers in building things such that
only LSB libraries
Hello Tracy,
Thanks for the report.
* Camp, TracyX E wrote on Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 06:41:23PM CET:
> I'm working on cleaning up various aspects of the LSB compiler tools,
> which are in fact wrappers around gcc. We've had a couple of bug
> reports describing various ways that lsbcc and libtool i
10 matches
Mail list logo