Hi Tim,
* Tim Rice wrote:
>
> CVS HEAD
>
> Is there any reason not to have ltmain.in in the source tree
> at configure time and generate ltmain.sh (from ltmain.in) in
> the build tree?
Please try the patch from
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2005-08/msg00039.html
> I'd like to b
On 2005-09-23, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ By the way, I don't think everyone in this discussion has subscribed
> this list; if in doubt, speak up, or even better, set Mail-Followup-To:
> next time ]
I'm following it on gmane, but an explicit Cc: isn't a problem.
> * Jacob Meus
On 2005-09-22, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Olly Betts wrote on Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 11:00:30PM CEST:
>> The bottom line for me is that if I explicitly add "-lstdc++" when
>> linking _xapian.so, it all works. If I don't, it doesn't. So I
>> kind of feel that ideally libtool shou
On 2005-09-23, Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have no statistics for how many shared libraries are written in c++ but do
> not take advantage of the standard c++ library, at a guess I'd say that the
> majority use some libstdc++ features.
It's perhaps worth noting that not linking l
Sorry for the self-followup.
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:02:03AM CEST:
> * Tim Rice wrote:
> >
> > CVS HEAD
> >
> > Is there any reason not to have ltmain.in in the source tree
> > at configure time and generate ltmain.sh (from ltmain.in) in
> > the build tree?
>
> Please
Hi folks,
how does libtool decide whether to link against an .la library
dynamically vs. statically ?
I'm currently working on my own implementation, since libtool
doesn't suit my needs (ie. sysroot'ed building), but I didn't
find any clear specification for libtool's behaviour.
cu
--
branch-1-5
Could someone explain why the libtool generated in the test dirs
are different than the one in the build dir?
Or more importanbtly, why a software package using ltmain.sh from 1.5.21a
would build a libtool that didn't work but copying libtool from
my libtool build dir would work. The
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 04:15:11PM +, Olly Betts wrote:
> On 2005-09-23, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [ By the way, I don't think everyone in this discussion has subscribed
> > this list; if in doubt, speak up, or even better, set Mail-Followup-To:
> > next time ]
>
> I'm fol
