Re: libtool --silent based on MAKEFLAGS?

2004-12-12 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Wildenhues wrote: | So, how about this? Let's have Automake include $(LIBTOOLFLAGS) in | their libtool invocation. The user can then use | LIBTOOLFLAGS=--silent | | What do you think? Forgetting the rest of you mail for the moment, why involve

Re: libtool --silent based on MAKEFLAGS?

2004-12-12 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Ralf> So, how about this? Let's have Automake include $(LIBTOOLFLAGS) in Ralf> their libtool invocation. The user can then use Ralf> LIBTOOLFLAGS=--silent Ralf> at either configure or make time. This approach is Automake-centr

libtoolize

2004-12-12 Thread Patrick Welche
What is libtoolize meant to do these days? It used to copy necessary files such as libtool.m4 ltsugar.m4 and friends into . or MACRO_DIR if defined. Now it seems it just copies ltmain.sh ?! That patch I sent to libtool-patches was just because I noticed that libtool's "install" tries to delete ${

Re: libtoolize

2004-12-12 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Patrick Welche wrote: As to where the point the finger, I would say "libtoolize" as it doesn't seem to be copying the .m4's from libtool-2.1a/m4, assuming that is what it is still meant to do.. I am pretty sure that Gary backed out support for the libtool version-specific m4 d

find out about super V`iagra

2004-12-12 Thread Clay Holcomb
New ClALlS softtabs = lNSTANT R0CKHARD ERECTl0NS Simply disolve HALF A PlLL under your tongue 10min before action, for results that last all weekend. Normal retail is $19/PlLL 0rder from us today at the price of $3.94 not interested(0pt-0ut) ___ http

buy C"ialis softtabs without embarrassment

2004-12-12 Thread Norberto Ferguson
New ClALlS softtabs = lNSTANT R0CKHARD ERECTl0NS Simply disolve HALF A PlLL under your tongue 10min before action, for results that last all weekend. Normal retail is $19/PlLL 0rder from us today at the price of $3.28 not interested(0pt-0ut) ___ http

Re: link_all_deplibs=yes

2004-12-12 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Albert Chin wrote on Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 10:55:14PM CET: > >From config/ltmain.m4sh (applies to 1.5 as well): > ... *snip* > ... > > Why enforce this only when $linkmode=prog? Why shouldn't the deplibs > additions in the above apply when creating libraries? > > I'm trying t

Re: libtool --silent based on MAKEFLAGS?

2004-12-12 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 02:29:30PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > | So, how about this? Let's have Automake include $(LIBTOOLFLAGS) in > | their libtool invocation. The user can then use > | LIBTOOLFLAGS=--silent > | > | What do you think? > > Forgetting the rest of

Re: link_all_deplibs=yes

2004-12-12 Thread Albert Chin
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 03:55:14PM -0600, Albert Chin wrote: > I'm trying to build kde-3.3.1 on AIX 5.2 and because deplibs isn't > added to link when $linkmode=prog, library linking is failing with > unresolved symbols (because the dependency libs from dependent .la > files aren't being included i