Re: 2 non-libtool libs want to start

2004-12-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ross Boylan wrote on Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 09:22:34PM CET: > I have two libraries, both of which want to be the one that starts. I > assume they both define main, though I have not verified that. Both are > 3rd party, non-libtool, libraries. The C `main' function is defined in these libraries?

Re: nm prints warnings when processing stripped shared libraries

2004-12-10 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: So, ok to apply the patch below to HEAD? With a ChangeLog entry :), yes. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: nm prints warnings when processing stripped shared libraries

2004-12-10 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: So, ok to apply the patch below to HEAD? Looks good to me. Bob Regards, Ralf Index: config/ltmain.m4sh === RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/config/ltmain.m4sh,v retrieving revision 1.34 dif

Re: libtool --silent based on MAKEFLAGS?

2004-12-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Martin, * Martin Waitz wrote on Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 02:50:42PM CET: > > next request: > > could libtool take a look at MAKEFLAGS and automatically use --silent > mode when 's' is included in the make flags? That sounds like a good idea -- in principle. > At the moment I'm unconditionally u

link_all_deplibs=yes

2004-12-10 Thread Albert Chin
>From config/ltmain.m4sh (applies to 1.5 as well): ... if test "$linkmode" = prog && test "$pass" != link; then newlib_search_path="$newlib_search_path $ladir" deplibs="$lib $deplibs" linkalldeplibs=no if test "$link_all_deplibs" != no || tes

Re: libtool --silent based on MAKEFLAGS?

2004-12-10 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Peter O'Gorman wrote: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Martin, * Martin Waitz wrote on Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 02:50:42PM CET: next request: could libtool take a look at MAKEFLAGS and automatically use --silent mode when 's' is included in the make flags? That sounds like a good idea --

Re: libtool --silent based on MAKEFLAGS?

2004-12-10 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Martin, * Martin Waitz wrote on Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 02:50:42PM CET: next request: could libtool take a look at MAKEFLAGS and automatically use --silent mode when 's' is included in the make flags? That sounds like a good idea -- in principle. I don't really like this ide

Download Free Music. Now You Can Too. Stop Paying For Your Music. - mcgill

2004-12-10 Thread Napster Equivalent
Hello Un limited Music and MP 3 songs Movies Games Software TV Shows Song Lyrics Audio Books Download anything you could possibly want in three simple, fast, and easy steps START DOWNLOADING NOW This service is Safe, Secure and Legal http://www.justforyounow.com/133.html If you are a beginner,

Re: libtool --silent based on MAKEFLAGS?

2004-12-10 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Martin Waitz wrote: hoi :) next request: could libtool take a look at MAKEFLAGS and automatically use --silent mode when 's' is included in the make flags? At the moment I'm unconditionally using libtool --silent to make 'make -s' usable. It would be nicer if libtool would hand