Hi,
This is a fragment of some libocc_mop.la file created by
libtool 1.5.6:
# The name that we can dlopen(3).
dlname='libocc_mop.0'
# Names of this library.
library_names='libocc_mop.0.0.0 libocc_mop.0 libocc_mop'
# The name of the static archive.
old_library='li
Hi Bob, Joe, libtoolers:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> It seems that the only valid test to determine the default output architecture
> is to compile code and then use 'file' or some other utility to determine the
> architecture. In order to produce multilib output, libtool would need to know
> the sp
Does 'make install' result in shared libraries with the ".so" part
similarly missing from their names? I ran across a package recently
(using libtool) that had this problem under Solaris. Regenerating the
build with local auto* tools solved the problem, but if the problem
occurs for more than
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Hi Bob, Joe, libtoolers:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
It seems that the only valid test to determine the default output architecture
is to compile code and then use 'file' or some other utility to determine the
architecture. In order to produce multilib output
