> Does this help?
> AC_LIBTOOL_TAGS([])
That's only in CVS (actually, I checked and it is not in 1.5, so it must be
in CVS).
I don't see it that bad that C is not a proper tag, actually.
It would also be good if enable_shared and enable_static became proper tag
variables instead of globals. BTW
Hi,
the libtool manual says that lt_dlopen does not yet load the
dependency libs of a libtool library while in fact it does.
Here is a patch:
--- libtool.texi~ 2003-11-14 15:39:08.0 +0100
+++ libtool.texi2003-11-14 15:39:32.0 +0100
@@ -2855,7 +2855,7 @@
native dyna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Vollmer wrote:
| --- libtool.texi~ 2003-11-14 15:39:08.0 +0100
| +++ libtool.texi 2003-11-14 15:39:32.0 +0100
| @@ -2855,7 +2855,7 @@
| native dynamic libraries.
|
| Unresolved symbols in the module are resolved using i
I'm reading the autobook -- it discusses lines like:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:22:47; libtool gcc -c hello.c
mkdir .libs
gcc -c hello.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/hello.lo
gcc -c hello.c -o hello.o >/dev/null 2>&1
mv -f .libs/hello.lo hello.lo
(this is from libtool 1.4 on redhat 7.2)
But libtool 1.5 wants
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marty Leisner wrote:
| I'm reading the autobook -- it discusses lines like:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:22:47; libtool gcc -c hello.c
| mkdir .libs
| gcc -c hello.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/hello.lo
| gcc -c hello.c -o hello.o >/dev/null 2>&1
| mv -f .libs/hell
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 10:44:52AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Does this help?
> > AC_LIBTOOL_TAGS([])
>
> That's only in CVS (actually, I checked and it is not in 1.5, so it must be
> in CVS).
I can send you a patch against 1.5 if you want.
> I don't see it that bad that C is not a proper t
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 10:44:52AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > Does this help?
> > > AC_LIBTOOL_TAGS([])
> >
> > That's only in CVS (actually, I checked and it is not in 1.5, so it must be
> > in CVS).
>
> I can send you a patch against 1.5 if you wa
