Re: libtool and cl

2003-03-29 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Robert Boehne wrote: > Braden, > > For libltdl to work, you'd have to have Windows > declspec(__dllimport) and declspec(__dllexport) applied > properly, which isn't currently done. As far as libname.lib It used to be supported by libltdl, but when GCC implemented the auto-im

Re: libtool and cl

2003-03-29 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 23:04, Robert Boehne wrote: > Braden, > > For libltdl to work, you'd have to have Windows > declspec(__dllimport) and declspec(__dllexport) applied > properly, which isn't currently done. As far as libname.lib > being used for both static & dynamic, AIX uses libname.a for >

Re: libtool and cl

2003-03-29 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 10:19, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Robert Boehne wrote: > > > Braden, > > > > For libltdl to work, you'd have to have Windows > > declspec(__dllimport) and declspec(__dllexport) applied > > properly, which isn't currently done. As far as libname.lib > > It

Re: libtool and cl

2003-03-29 Thread Max Bowsher
Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Robert Boehne wrote: > >> Braden, >> >> For libltdl to work, you'd have to have Windows >> declspec(__dllimport) and declspec(__dllexport) applied >> properly, which isn't currently done. As far as libname.lib > > It used to be supported by libltdl,

Re: libtool and cl

2003-03-29 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > > > > It used to be supported by libltdl, but when GCC implemented the > > auto-import capability, Gary removed the support. I think it was a > > bad idea to remove the support. There are plenty of reasons to use > > the Microsoft compiler rather than GCC

Re: libtool and cl

2003-03-29 Thread Charles Wilson
Braden McDaniel wrote: It used to be supported by libltdl, but when GCC implemented the auto-import capability, Gary removed the support. I think it was a bad idea to remove the support. There are plenty of reasons to use the Microsoft compiler rather than GCC under Windows since GCC has limited

Re: libtool and cl

2003-03-29 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Charles Wilson wrote: > > Also wrt Bob, concerning mingw vs cl: IMO, if you're using cl and > relying on its non-standard extensions to C and C++, then you are > obviously not trying to write portable code. In that case, you should > simply use the MSVC support for building DL

Re: libtool and cl

2003-03-29 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 18:05, Charles Wilson wrote: > Braden McDaniel wrote: > > >>It used to be supported by libltdl, but when GCC implemented the > >>auto-import capability, Gary removed the support. I think it was a > >>bad idea to remove the support. There are plenty of reasons to use > >>the