Hi,
Trying to solve my problem with compiling C++ on Solaris, I downloaded
and installed a newer of libtool version:
/usr/bin/libtool --version
ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.4e (1.1178 2003/01/15 02:55:33)
When compiling with:
./configure --with-omni=$HOME/omniorb --without-zlib --disable-static
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 03:27:25PM +0100, Erik Assum wrote:
> ld: fatal: symbol `bool Tango::operator==(const Tango::BlackBoxElt&,const
>Tango::BlackBoxElt&)' is multiply-defined:
> (file .libs/tangoSK.o and file .libs/tangoDynSK.o);
> ld: fatal: symbol `bool Tango::operator<(const Tango::
* Albert Chin
| On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 03:27:25PM +0100, Erik Assum wrote:
| > ld: fatal: symbol `bool Tango::operator==(const Tango::BlackBoxElt&,const
|Tango::BlackBoxElt&)' is multiply-defined:
| > (file .libs/tangoSK.o and file .libs/tangoDynSK.o);
| > ld: fatal: symbol `bool Tango::o
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 05:39:50PM +0100, Erik Assum wrote:
> * Albert Chin
> | On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 03:27:25PM +0100, Erik Assum wrote:
> | > ld: fatal: symbol `bool Tango::operator==(const Tango::BlackBoxElt&,const
>Tango::BlackBoxElt&)' is multiply-defined:
> | > (file .libs/tangoSK.
This patch passes my test. What do we need to do to get this accepted
into libtool cvs HEAD?
Earnie.
Charles Wilson wrote:
Okay, this version
1) puts lt-foo.c into .libs
2) "libtool --mode=clean" does the right thing --- cleans up foo,
foo.exe, .libs/foo.exe, .libs/lt-foo.c, plus whatever el
Earnie Boyd wrote:
>
> This patch passes my test. What do we need to do to get this accepted
> into libtool cvs HEAD?
> > + newargz[0] = xstrdup("/bin/sh");
This may not be the shell and there is no point allocating it.
It is fine to use it from static memory.
___
Bruce Korb wrote:
Earnie Boyd wrote:
This patch passes my test. What do we need to do to get this accepted
into libtool cvs HEAD?
+ newargz[0] = xstrdup("/bin/sh");
This may not be the shell and there is no point allocating it.
It is fine to use it from static memory.
Okay, the secon
Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> All good ideas, and I don't really have a preference for any of them.
> If you do, let me know or I'll just pick the one that looks easiest.
I'd think an autoconf macro would be ok, to be used for instance
AC_LIBTOOL_PICDEF([-DPIC])
AC
Charles Wilson wrote:
>
> Bruce Korb wrote:
> > Earnie Boyd wrote:
> >
> >>This patch passes my test. What do we need to do to get this accepted
> >>into libtool cvs HEAD?
> >
> >
> >>>+ newargz[0] = xstrdup("/bin/sh");
> >>
> >
> > This may not be the shell and there is no point allocating it.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:13:54AM +1000, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > All good ideas, and I don't really have a preference for any of them.
> > If you do, let me know or I'll just pick the one that looks easiest.
>
> I'd think an autoconf macro would be ok
10 matches
Mail list logo
