RE: Version numbering change on IRIX

2002-11-18 Thread Boehne, Robert
Title: RE: Version numbering change on IRIX Steve, IMHO it isn't worth the bother to allow both, I'll just revert patch. Everyone agree? Robert -Original Message- From: Steve M. Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 8:21 PM To: Boehne, Robert; [EMAIL

cross-compiling several dependent libraries

2002-11-18 Thread Jan Weil
Hi all, I am confronted with a problem which is already known. But I didn't find a solution yet. BTW, is there a way to _search_ the GNU mailing-list archives? I found exactly the same problem described here: http://www.linuxsh.st.com/getting_started/gtk2_cross_compile.php3#glib_target I'm usin

Re: Maintainership

2002-11-18 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Akim Demaille wrote: > > Bob> Rumor has it that libtool still works with Autoconf 2.13. It would be > Bob> wise not to intentionally break compatability with Autoconf 2.13. > Bob> However, I only test with the most current releases of Autoconf. > > It has once been suggest

Re: Version numbering change on IRIX

2002-11-18 Thread Rainer Orth
Robert, > IMHO it isn't worth the bother to allow both, I'll just revert patch. > Everyone agree? certainly :-) If the difference in shlib version numbering between Solaris/Linux and IRIX is really a FAQ that causes user confusion, perhaps this should be documented? Rainer ___

CVS libtool package issues

2002-11-18 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
There are a number CVS libtool package issues which should be addressed before libtool 1.5 is released. 1) 'make distclean' does not work unless 'make test' has been performed since otherwise there are no Makefiles in the test directory. 2) Under Solaris, 'make test' somehow runs th

Re: CVS libtool package issues

2002-11-18 Thread Charles Wilson
There are a number CVS libtool package issues which should be addressed before libtool 1.5 is released. Also, check the 'In the Near Term" section here: http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/future.html Of the four bullet points, AFAIK only one ("Robert Collins...") has actually been achieved.

Re: CVS libtool package issues

2002-11-18 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Charles Wilson wrote: > Also, check the 'In the Near Term" section here: > http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/future.html > Of the four bullet points, AFAIK only one ("Robert Collins...") has > actually been achieved. This page seems to be rather out of date. > > 3) The M

Re: CVS libtool package issues

2002-11-18 Thread Charles Wilson
Bob Friesenhahn wrote: Also, check the 'In the Near Term" section here: http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/future.html Of the four bullet points, AFAIK only one ("Robert Collins...") has actually been achieved. This page seems to be rather out of date. Okay, but it duplicates a lot of wha