> You have therefore been approved for a lump sum pay
> out of US$1,500,000.00 in cash credited to file REF
> NO. REF: WBL/67-B773524441. This is from total
As far as I remember, within the last ?month? a French court forced
a company who promised a prize of XXX to actually pay it. (Was one
of
Support Request #101415, was updated on 2002-Oct-18 08:55
You can respond by visiting:
http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?func=detailsupport&support_id=101415&group_id=25
Category: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Summary: libtool + C++ + gcc on solaris
By: rboehne
Date: 2002-Oct-22 08:28
Logged In
uhmm... sorry for the resend.
I forgot to mention to CC me, as I am NOT subscribed on this list.
Hi!
I have found yet another libtool bug.
I am using autoconf 2.52, automake 1.6.1 and libtool (latest CVS version of
branch-1-4).
Short bug description: I can't link against a framework, because
Ross,
This patch seems to be pretty significant. Do you have paperwork
filed with the FSF which supports significant contributions to
libtool?
Bob
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> This patch was made against libtool.m4 version 1.268.
>
>
> ChangeLog
>
> 2002-10-22 Ross Alexande
Bob,
No, but I am aware of the requirements. I've looked at the copyright
notice but I access the form. Can you please email me one.
Cheers,
Ross
-
Ross Alexander "We demand clearly def
> From: Christoph Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Short bug description: I can't link against a framework, because libtool
> throughs the needed -framework param away.
I hit this problem once and created a patch for it, but it's non-trivial.
Even if libtool recognizes it as a LDFLAG, libtool does t
Is the MSVC++ compiler on WinNT supported?
Can't seem to find any documents, except for a reference
in libtool.m4.
regards,
jerry
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Iseri, Jerry wrote:
> Is the MSVC++ compiler on WinNT supported?
> Can't seem to find any documents, except for a reference
> in libtool.m4.
I expect that it used to work but that since support has not been
maintained, maintenance is required before it will work again.
Liblt
> > From: Christoph Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Short bug description: I can't link against a framework, because libtool
> > throughs the needed -framework param away.
>
> I hit this problem once and created a patch for it, but it's non-trivial.
> Even if libtool recognizes it as a LDFLAG,
2002-10-15 Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* libtool.m4 (AC_LIBTOOL_SYS_MAX_CMD_LEN): avoid long delay on
cygwin/Win9x when computing commandline length.
(AC_LIBTOOL_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER): fix postinstall_cmds when
sources are in a subdirectory
* ltdl.m4
Charles,
I think this fix was accidentally piggybacked on top of
another patch I checked in. I knew it happened after
the check in, but I thought I'd see if it fixed the problem
rather than back it out or add a ChangeLog entry.
I'll try to be more careful. ;)
Rob
--
Robert Boehne
Robert, Naofumi,
One of the things I am curious about is whether or not impgen.c is
going to be used very often in the future. I had been of the notion
that the latest set of patches more or less did away with the use of
that particular piece of code, although the code for impgen.c itself
has n
On 22 Oct 2002, Elizabeth Barham wrote:
>From what I understand, the newer gcc (and/or gnu ld) on win32 uses
> an "auto import" feature, and the old way of importing symbols (via
> compiling impgen.c) is no longer needed, although there was some
> platform that still uses the older method (pc3
I suppose that leaves one question (in my mind at least),
and that is, What is pw32?
Robert
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
> On 22 Oct 2002, Elizabeth Barham wrote:
>
> >From what I understand, the newer gcc (and/or gnu ld) on win32 uses
> > an "auto import" feature, and the old way of importing
14 matches
Mail list logo
