I'm trying to build RPMS for Swarm (www.swarm.org) on a RH8.0 system. I
am having trouble with a problem that is similar to a libtool problem
that came up almost one year ago and we discussed it in the RPM list as
well as libtool and Swarm lists.
With libtool 1.4.2, rpm/libtool would fail to b
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> Is your patch against CVS head? Or the release 1.4.2?
CVS head.
Bob
>
> Earnie.
>
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > The attached patch to FSF CVS libtool is intended to make libtool
> > (mostly) behave as it does for Cygwin when executed with MinGW. It
> >
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 10:43:08AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
> >
> > >> The idea of supporting a --bindir option is tempting, but then
> > >> 'libtool --mode=install' stops looking like a simple install program,
> > >> and in fact, the --bindir option w
Title: Untitled Document
Problemas de
seguridad de Outlook Express: sale otro parche.
This problem does not exist in the CVS version of libtool, which uses
the C++ compiler to link C++ objects. The fix will be in libtool 1.5.
Bob
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Support Request #101415, was updated on 2002-Oct-18 09:55
> You can respond by visiting:
> http://sa
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 10:43:08AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
> > >
> > > >> The idea of supporting a --bindir option is tempting, but then
> > > >> 'libtool --mode=install' stops looking like a simple install
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 13:34:06 -0500 (CDT)
Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bob,
I sent a patch to libtool-patch about a week ago. The patch
was against libtool-1.4e. I will get the latest libtool.m4
from CVSweb and redo the patch. It is fairly extensive
reworking of the hpux code. T
Charles,
Please re-send your Cygwin patch. I tried retrieving the patch you
sent from
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/libtool-patches/2002-October/002100.html
since I never recieved it from the list, but patch does a terrible job
with it, applying the patches to the wrong places in the file (offset
> "Bob" == Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bob> This may be because the mail archive is in HTML format, and
Bob> saving to text makes it subject to the formatting whims of my
Bob> browser. I also saved directly to HTML but that actually did
Bob> worse.
FWIW: I find the appended s
