On Thursday 11 April 2002 8:12 pm, Michael Matz wrote:
[...]
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Marc Espie wrote:
[...]
> > Where do you think the patches come from ? someone has to write them in
>
> Reread my mail. I said that I have patches for that, just not looked at
> them yet, partly because they mi
Hello,
I recently installed ethereal (0.9.3).
I had one problem, which is libtool related:
> I configured using:
> export CC=cc
> export CPPFLAGS="-I/pd/libs/include/"
> export LDFLAGS=" -L/pd/libs/lib/"
> export CFLAGS="+DAportable -Ae +O2"
> ./configure -prefix=/pd/ethereal0.9.3 --without-gcc
Jost:
The flag you referr to is hp-compiler specific, so it can't
be put into ltmain.in. Possibly a better solution is to
figure out why +DAportable was lost. In the mean time you
could probably work around this by changing:
export CFLAGS="+DAportable -Ae +O2"
to
export CFLAGS="-Wc,+DAportable
Jost:
The problem may be that Libtool doesn't treat options with "+"
the same way it treats "-". It doesn't sound like that would be
terribly difficult to fix though. But before you go looking in
ltmain.in, you might want to try the CVS head version of Libtool.
There have been recent changes to
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 08:45, Grzegorz Jakacki wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Why is there so much spam on [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Is there anybody blocking
> spammers?
Mailman allows filtering of messages only on headers, so a lot of spam
gets through. Since traffic on [EMAIL PROTECTED] is fairly low, the
sign
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 07:06, ahoward wrote:
>
> can anyone comment on why using cp instead of install should make a
> difference? i've even notice weird behavior using different install
> programs.
Are the ownership or permissions on the installed file different when
using one vs. another?
Are
