Turn off warning when installing modules?

2001-10-10 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
Is there a good way to turn off the usage message that gets displayed every time a module is installed by libtool? This usage message is useful for normal shared libraries, but is not useful for loadable modules. Thanks, Bob == Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTE

GNU libtool 32/64-bit Support

2001-10-10 Thread Torok-1, Maria
Hello, We're currently using GNU libtool v1.4 on Solaris 2.6, but are preparing to upgrade to Solaris 8. Can you please tell me if you provide a 32-bit and 64-bit version of libtool and for how long you plan on supporting them? Thank you, Maria E. Torok NASA - CLCS COTS Software Coordinator Lock

Re: GNU libtool 32/64-bit Support

2001-10-10 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Torok-1, Maria wrote: > We're currently using GNU libtool v1.4 on Solaris 2.6, but are preparing to > upgrade to Solaris 8. Can you please tell me if you provide a 32-bit and > 64-bit version of libtool and for how long you plan on supporting them? Libtool itself is a scrip

Re: ar cru piecewise linking of same named objects

2001-10-10 Thread Kevin Ryde
Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Could you try changing AR_FLAGS in your libtool script > to see if that works? AR_FLAGS=cq seems to work on all the systems I've tried, and fixes the ultrix problem. As long as ranlib does its job then I imagine it'd have to work everywhere. ___

Re: ar cru piecewise linking of same named objects

2001-10-10 Thread Robert Boehne
Kevin Ryde wrote: > > Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Could you try changing AR_FLAGS in your libtool script > > to see if that works? > > AR_FLAGS=cq seems to work on all the systems I've tried, and fixes the > ultrix problem. As long as ranlib does its job then I imagine it'

Re: ar cru piecewise linking of same named objects

2001-10-10 Thread Kevin Ryde
Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What's the Ultrix problem? It was vax-dec-ultrix4.5 which had the small command line limit and suffered in the piecewise link. ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinf

libtool cvs rm -f ""

2001-10-10 Thread Kevin Ryde
Solaris 2.7 and HP-UX 10 don't think much of rm -f "" it provokes a bit of an error rm: cannot remove `.' or `..' This arises from libtool when compiling, I think due to $output_obj being empty when -c -o works. This is no more than cosmetic, but perhaps cases where that might

Re: libtool cvs rm -f ""

2001-10-10 Thread Olly Betts
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 09:24:15AM +1000, Kevin Ryde wrote: > Solaris 2.7 and HP-UX 10 don't think much of > > rm -f "" > > it provokes a bit of an error > > rm: cannot remove `.' or `..' > > This arises from libtool when compiling, I think due to $output_obj > being empty when

Re: libtool cvs rm -f ""

2001-10-10 Thread Kevin Ryde
Olly Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ## We must test each macro because it might be empty, and an empty "rm > ## -rf" command looks disturbing. Also, the Solaris 2.4 "rm" will > ## return an error if there are no arguments other than "-f". Soor, I pruned too much, the libtool case is inst

Re: libtool cvs rm -f ""

2001-10-10 Thread Olly Betts
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 09:57:18AM +1000, Kevin Ryde wrote: > Soor, I pruned too much, the libtool case is instead something like > > rm -f "foo.o" "" Ah right. > It's the empty argument which is the problem, not no arguments as > such. > > I guess the quotes support spaces in filename

Re: GNU autoconf, automake, make, m4 32/64-bit Support

2001-10-10 Thread Guido Draheim
"Torok-1, Maria" wrote: > > Anything you could tell me regarding 32-bit and 64-bit versions of automake, > make, and m4 would also be appreciated! > [..] > > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Torok-1, Maria" wrote: > We're currently using GNU libtool v1.4 on Solaris 2.6, ... before you flood the mai