I'm trying to install a program that relies on libtool and ltdl. It's
not going very well.
I'm using these libs:
libltdl-1.4-2.i586.rpm*
libtool-1.4/
The problem I keep running into is ltmain.sh is not found. Even though I
have run libtoolize -f . Here is the output I get after.
--
libtoo
I'm trying to install a program that relies on libtool and ltdl. It's
not going very well.
I'm using these libs:
libltdl-1.4-2.i586.rpm*
libtool-1.4/
The problem I keep running into is ltmain.sh is not found. Even though I
have run libtoolize -f . Here is the output I get after.
--
libtoo
Interesting!
I'd say that this is because cygwin allocates head for the command line, and
doesn't have a built-in limit (AFAIK).
libtoolers - perhaps the max command line test should stop somewhere before
the multi-megabyte point ?
Rob
- Original Message -
From: "Max Bowsher" <[EMAIL P
Hi,
sorry if this is not really specific to libtool but it I have this
little boring warning in a file of mine when using lt_dladdsearchdir :
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/usr/local/etc\"
-DPKGDATADIR=\"/usr/local/share/libbraille\" -DPKGLIBDIR=\"/usr/local/lib/libbraille\"
In regard to: a small C warning, Sebastien Sable said (at 8:36pm on Jul 10,...:
>sorry if this is not really specific to libtool but it I have this
>little boring warning in a file of mine when using lt_dladdsearchdir :
>
>gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/usr/local/etc\"
>-DPKGDA
Tim Mooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's not nothing, at least on architectures that aren't ILP32. Your program
> will work fine on Linux on Intel, but it will fail on 64 bit (LP64) OSes.
Sorry that was a really stupid mistake from me:
I was persuaded for some reason that the problem was
Does the ltmain.sh link in your projecxt directory point to a missing or
zero-length file?
Cheers,
Gary.
On Tuesday 10 July 2001 9:27 am, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> I'm trying to install a program that relies on libtool and ltdl. It's
> not going very well.
>
> I'm using these libs:
>
>
This is certainly out of kilter, since the test assumes that it has `enough'
buffer space at 512K now (1Mb until yesterday). It looks like the code for
the test is not breaking out of the loop on cygwin for some reason...
Cheers,
Gary.
On Tuesday 10 July 2001 1:08 pm, Robert Collins
In regard to: [Announce] libtool-1.4b, Gary V. Vaughan said (at 12:17am on...:
>The most important user-visible changes since release 1.4 follow:
>
>New in 1.4b: 2001-07-09
>* Now bootstraps with autoconf-2.50 and automake-1.4-p4.
If I grab the tarball from alpha.gnu.org and untar it and then
On Wednesday 11 July 2001 1:17 am, Tim Mooney wrote:
> In regard to: [Announce] libtool-1.4b, Gary V. Vaughan said (at 12:17am
on...:
> >The most important user-visible changes since release 1.4 follow:
> >
> >New in 1.4b: 2001-07-09
> >* Now bootstraps with autoconf-2.50 and automake-1.4-p4.
>
Hello libtoolers,
Here is a patch to run libtool 1.4 on QNX. I set
lt_cv_deplibs_check_method to 'unknown' because I was unable to
successfully run the test suite: since I don't have direct access to
the QNX box, I'm working through it with someone else. However, these
changes do allow us to bu
Congratulations for completing the merge, and sorry about my long
absence. I'm afraid it will still last for a while, though :-(
On Jun 24, 2001, "Gary V.Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, I would like to declare MLB officially dead, and reopen HEAD for
> development.
Hmm... This
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Would anybody mind if I kept using the libtool MLB for this purpose,
> and explain to anybody who happens to post a patch for that branch
> that a corresponding patch for mainline is required before the patch
> can go in the branch?
I'm ok.
Just try to ensure that the lt
13 matches
Mail list logo
