[marcelo.magallon@bigfoot.com: Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re: libtool]

2001-06-07 Thread Sven M. Hallberg
Hi, I'm working on the Mesa project's build system using autoconf, automake, and libtool. We're running into the following problem: We use the formula version-info = Major+minor:Mesa_version:Minor to compute proper libtool version-info from the OpenGL version number (1.2) and our current Mesa r

Re: [marcelo.magallon@bigfoot.com: Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re: libtool]

2001-06-07 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Sven M. Hallberg writes: > We use the formula > version-info = Major+minor:Mesa_version:Minor > to compute proper libtool version-info from the OpenGL version number (1.2) > and our current Mesa release number (MM.Mm.Mt, e.g. 3.5.0). So, Mesa_version > is an integer derived from that release num

libtool 1.4 failure on Solaris 8

2001-06-07 Thread Bruce Korb
Building ethereal: Making all in gryphon /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I/u/local/include -I../.. -I../../wiretap -I../../epan -I/usr/local/include -I/u/local/include -Wall -g -O2 -I../.. -I../../wiretap -I../../epan -I/usr/local/include -I/usr

Re: libtool 1.4 failure on Solaris 8

2001-06-07 Thread Bruce Korb
This patch got me through the ugly ethereal build. I applied them to "libtool", so obviously they need to be applied to the ltmain.in file. I do not know if every one of these is strictly required, I started getting impatient. :-) Regards, Bruce $ gdiff -u libtool /tmp/LIBTOOL --- lib

Re: libtool 1.4 failure on Solaris 8

2001-06-07 Thread libtool
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:48:04AM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote: > Building ethereal: > > Making all in gryphon > /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. > -I../.. -I/u/local/include -I../.. -I../../wiretap -I../../epan > -I/usr/local/include -I/u/local/include -Wall

Re: [marcelo.magallon@bigfoot.com: Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re: libtool]

2001-06-07 Thread libtool
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 11:50:44AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote: > I'm not going to put a lot of effort into explaining this but here's > the story. > > Mesa's used the convention libGL.so.1.2.xxyyzz for some years now. > The "1.2" indicates the library implements the OpenGL 1.2 API. > Anything else t

Re: libtool 1.4 failure on Solaris 8

2001-06-07 Thread Bruce Korb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:48:04AM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote: > > Building ethereal: > > > > Making all in gryphon > > /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. > > -I../.. -I/u/local/include -I../.. -I../../wiretap -I../../epan > > -I/us

Re: [marcelo.magallon@bigfoot.com: Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re: libtool]

2001-06-07 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > So the 1.2 is "static"? Have you looked at -release? I don't know what > this will do to the SONAME though. It won't give you the name above > but close enough (libGL-1.2.xxyyzz.so). This is the problem. In this case the soname *must* be libGL.so.1 (on Linux)

Re: [marcelo.magallon@bigfoot.com: Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re: libtool]

2001-06-07 Thread Brian Paul
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Sven M. Hallberg writes: > > > We use the formula > > version-info = Major+minor:Mesa_version:Minor > > to compute proper libtool version-info from the OpenGL version number (1.2) > > and our current Mesa release number (MM.Mm.Mt, e.g. 3.5.0). So, Mesa_version > > is

Re: [marcelo.magallon@bigfoot.com: Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re: libtool]

2001-06-07 Thread Lars J. Aas
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 11:50:44AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote: : I'm not going to put a lot of effort into explaining this but here's : the story. : : Mesa's used the convention libGL.so.1.2.xxyyzz for some years now. : The "1.2" indicates the library implements the OpenGL 1.2 API. : Anything else t