On Jan 24, 2001, Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #1) I have to check for the existence of 'wc -c' to check the
> command line length.
I'd rather not rely upon fixed limits. I was thinking about doing it
dynamically. For example, as the command line grows, test that you
can still $e
On Jan 26, 2001, Christoph Pfisterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My patch is attached to this message; I hope it's in good shape.
It's hard to tell, since it requires binhex to be viewed.
Anyway, Darwin is already supported in CVS versions of libtool. Maybe
you should consider using it, inste
On Jan 19, 2001, Alexander Mai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However upon linking our shared lib a -lbar may fail - since the
> LDFLAGS var is not used here!
Huh? LDFLAGS is certainly used when linking both static and shared
libraries. The difference is only at run-time. Are you *running*
prog
On Jan 19, 2001, Alexander Mai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AC_PROG_LIBTOOL I get
> Makefile.am:47: library used but `LIBTOOL' not defined in `configure.in'
automake 1.4 doesn't understand AC_PROG_LIBTOOL.
> In both cases configure later on asks for a ltconfig which it can't find:
Did you
On Jan 22, 2001, Alexander Mai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now I installed the auto* tools again and it seems things do almost
> work now (still get an autoconf error message, but configure
> seems to run?!:
> autoconf: Undefined macros:
> ***BUG in Autoconf--please report*** AC_TRY_DLOPEN_SELF
On Jan 22, 2001, Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
>> I am trying to get the dramatic loading of C++ libraries to work on Solaris
>> but I am running into problems with the fact that shared C++ libraries are
>> not provided on many systems beca
Hi,
If I want to test libtool 1.4 (I develop on openBSD & windows 2K (via cygwin) -
which may be an odd combination :-]), what's the
recommended autoconf version to get?
I saw a message recently about libtool CVS not being autoconf CVS ready which is what
has prompted my question.
Sometime
On Jan 31, 2001, "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I want to test libtool 1.4 (I develop on openBSD & windows 2K
> (via cygwin) - which may be an odd combination :-]), what's the
> recommended autoconf version to get?
I'd stay with 2.13, unless you really mean to test CVS autoconf
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Robert Collins wrote:
> Hi,
> If I want to test libtool 1.4 (I develop on openBSD & windows
> 2K (via cygwin) - which may be an odd combination :-]), what's the
> recommended autoconf version to get?
>
> I saw a message recently about libtool CVS not being autoconf CVS
>
Title: RE: Fix for Arg list too long
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Oliva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 2:40 AM
To: Boehne, Robert
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fix for Arg list too long
>On Jan 24, 2001, Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On Jan 31, 2001, "Boehne, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 128Kb, is probably reasonable. The command might be the expr above or
>> a non-built-in echo (using the $0 --fallback-echo comes to mind).
>>
> Alexandre, I'm not familiar with '$0 --fallback-echo', could you
> elaborate on this a
Hi, me again (the guy with the sed problem in cvs-fresh autoconf)
I have a project that compiles nicely on a computer with one
well-installed gcc/g++ in the path. I get the following problem on a
sun which has several versions of gcc. I set $CC $CXX $CXXCPP
To me, things seem to be related t
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 05:27:25PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
: On Jan 31, 2001, "Boehne, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > SGI was one system that would not allow me to use $reload_cmds because
: > $LD was set to CC.
:
: This is wrong. LD should be ld, not cc. That was a kludge we'd us
> "AO" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AO> On Jan 31, 2001, Wolfgang Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I get the following problem on a sun which has several versions of
>> gcc.
AO> I don't see any problem here. Or do you mean that gibberish after
AO> your signatur
On Jan 31, 2001, Wolfgang Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get the following problem on a sun which has several versions of
> gcc.
I don't see any problem here. Or do you mean that gibberish after
your signature? :-)
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oli
On 31 Jan 2001, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Try adding -Wc,-mimpure-text to the command line. If it works, I'd
> be willing to accept a patch that:
>
> (i) tests whether GCC supports it and use it to build shared
> libraries. Only in this case should we set deplibs_check_method to
> pass_all on So
I would like to check in the patches to the HEAD branch
that Dan McNichol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent in on January 10.
If any one has any objections, speak now or forever
hold your peace.
--
Robert Boehne Software Engineer
Ricardo Software Chicago Technical Center
TEL: (630)789-0003
Title: RE: Fix for Arg list too long
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Oliva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 1:27 PM
To: Boehne, Robert
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Fix for Arg list too long
On Jan 31, 2001, "Boehne, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
18 matches
Mail list logo
