> -Original Message-
> From: Alexandre Oliva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 11:53 PM
> To: Kevin Atkinson
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Problem with ltdl.h
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2000, Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 28 Nov 2000, Alex
Oops, sending my previous mail just trigger our mail server to notify me of
the other mails :-)
Please forgive the unneeded noise.
Bernard
PS: BTW renaming the struct to "struct lt_dlhandle_struct" or seems better
than renaming again the typedef, as lt_dlhandle is conveying the right
se
I have tried to create a working example for shared libs on AIX4.2 and succeded.
unfortunaly i dont have the time to translate my findings into libtools.
doese sombody care about the AIX port ? i can send him everything i have here.
walter
__
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 01:01:23AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > How about we simply change the name of the struct to lt_handlerecord
> > or something?
>
> I prefer `something' :-)
>
> How about `typedef struct lt_dlhandle_st
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alexandre Oliva writes:
>[linking a library from other libraries with no object files]
>
>The point is that this just can't be done portably.
Since libtool's major purpose is to allow libraries to be built using a
portable interface, perhaps it should take care of
