"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:39:30PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote:
> > [I hope this is the right place for the page problem...]
> >
> > I've noticed that the
> >
> > http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/future.html
> >
> > page seems to have a cvs conflict in it. Take a look
I don't believe the following behavior is possible in the current
libtool. However, if it is, please correct me.
In the upcoming libtool (1.4?) it would be nice on cygwin/windows-ish
platforms, if the libfoo.la file could instruct libtool that it may need
different -Ddefines when compiling an obj
Hello Charles,
Charles S. Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CSW> I don't believe the following behavior is possible in the current
CSW> libtool. However, if it is, please correct me.
CSW> In the upcoming libtool (1.4?) it would be nice on cygwin/windows-ish
CSW> platforms, if the libfoo.la file
Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
>
> Hello Charles,
>
> Charles S. Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> CSW> I don't believe the following behavior is possible in the current
> CSW> libtool. However, if it is, please correct me.
>
> CSW> In the upcoming libtool (1.4?) it would be nice on cygwin/windows
