Re: ML branch: okay to switch to CVS automake/autoconf?

2000-06-04 Thread Ossama Othman
Hi Alexandre, On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 05:52:19PM -0700, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Jun 2, 2000, Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I wanted to check with you about switching that branch to use CVS > > autoconf and CVS automake. > > Unless there's a very pressing reason to do it, I

Re: ML branch: okay to switch to CVS automake/autoconf?

2000-06-04 Thread Ossama Othman
Hi, On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 06:15:34PM -0700, Mo DeJong wrote: > Why don't we just create a new branch in the libtool CVS for > autoconf 2.14 support? We can fix all the problems caused by the > autoconf upgrade on the branch and then merge it back into > the HEAD down the road. Does anyone see a

Re: think I found it

2000-06-04 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, On Sun, 4 Jun 2000, Stephan Kulow wrote: > The following patch adds paths to dependent libs in end of the > link line instead in front. The patch looks weired, but right after > the order is reordered :) Not too weired, as all the other assignments to deplibs in this big loop do it the same