multi language branch (was: ltconfig decision in creating shared (c++) libraries on solaris.)

2000-02-17 Thread Michael Forster
Hi, Alexandre wrote: > C++ support is under development in the multi-language-branch of the > libtool CVS tree. Feel free to give it a try, and please report any > problems you find. When running bootstrap on the sources from the multi-language-branch I get the following error messages: ca

Re: multi language branch (was: ltconfig decision in creating shared (c++) libraries on solaris.)

2000-02-17 Thread Michael Forster
Hi, Sorry about the wrong PGP signature. Here is the corrected version: Alexandre wrote: > C++ support is under development in the multi-language-branch of the > libtool CVS tree. Feel free to give it a try, and please report any > problems you find. When running bootstrap on the sources from

Re: ltconfig decision in creating shared (c++) libraries on solaris.

2000-02-17 Thread Martin Proulx
Ossama Othman wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > > BTW, are you using the AC_LIBTOOL_CXX macro, or are you appending > manually? It looks like you're appending manually. I bet that's why > the deplibs_check_method wasn't set properly for you. Sorry, I didn't > document AC_LIBTOOL_CXX yet. > You're

Re: how install convenience library, to be linked into shared lib?

2000-02-17 Thread Axel Belinfante
Stephan, thanks for your reply! I have tried your suggestion (installing a plain shared library instead of a convenience library), and basically it works, but this has (seems to have) some disdavantages. One problem is that the shared library that the user builds as a Tcl extension (and which the

Re: ILD too long

2000-02-17 Thread Thomas Tanner
On 14-Feb-2000 Stephan Kulow wrote: > Yes. I cleaned up KDE's situation a bit by now in removing LDFLAGS > that weren't strictly necessary but it's still a pain. I think, the > ILD should > 1) remove doubled -L calls (this should be quite simple as done with > the usual config.cache way) OK