Thanks for all your clarifying emails :-)
cheers
Lore
--
Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DI, Univ. Torino
ICQ# lbetto, 16080134 (GNU/Linux User # 158233)
HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com
http://www.myspace.com/supertrouperabba
BLOGS: htt
* Kurt Roeckx wrote on Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 07:53:50PM CEST:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 06:30:18PM +0200, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
> > from what I understand, at least in a Unix environment, if the
> > library version is
> >
> > current:revision:age
> >
> > the soname will be
> >
> > (current-age).
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 06:30:18PM +0200, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
> Hi
>
> from what I understand, at least in a Unix environment, if the
> library version is
>
> current:revision:age
>
> the soname will be
>
> (current-age).age.revision
No,
The soname will be "libname.so.(current-age)"
The f
Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
> Hi
>
> from what I understand, at least in a Unix environment, if the library
> version is
>
> current:revision:age
>
> the soname will be
>
> (current-age).age.revision
>
> won't it?
>
> Now if I have a library version (the revision should not be important in
> this
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
from what I understand, at least in a Unix environment, if the library
version is
Note that by "Unix" you must be specifically describing ELF as it
works for Linux. There are "Unix" systems which do not work as you
describe.
If I now remove an in
Hi
from what I understand, at least in a Unix environment, if the library
version is
current:revision:age
the soname will be
(current-age).age.revision
won't it?
Now if I have a library version (the revision should not be important in
this context)
5:_:4
the soname will be
1.4._
righ