Re: use of -fno-common on Darwin

2006-01-10 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul Eggert wrote: > "Peter O'Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > getprogname(3), if it exists, can be used as well as other > > alternatives (e.g. argv[0]). > > Thanks, I wasn't aware of the BSD getprogname until now. Me too. > How about this proposal? > > * Change the progname module to use

Re: use of -fno-common on Darwin

2006-01-09 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Paul Eggert wrote: "Peter O'Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: getprogname(3), if it exists, can be used as well as other alternatives (e.g. argv[0]). Thanks, I wasn't aware of the BSD getprogname until now. How about this proposal? * Change the progname module to use

Re: use of -fno-common on Darwin

2006-01-09 Thread Paul Eggert
"Peter O'Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > getprogname(3), if it exists, can be used as well as other > alternatives (e.g. argv[0]). Thanks, I wasn't aware of the BSD getprogname until now. How about this proposal? * Change the progname module to use the BSD getprogname naming convention.

Re: use of -fno-common on Darwin

2006-01-09 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Wildenhues wrote: | [ This is http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/5080 | Please remove bug-gnulib from followups. Thank you. ] | | * Paul Eggert wrote on Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 12:06:59AM CET: | |>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) w

use of -fno-common on Darwin (was: use of program_name)

2006-01-09 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ This is http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/5080 Please remove bug-gnulib from followups. Thank you. ] * Paul Eggert wrote on Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 12:06:59AM CET: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes: > > > Is it a problem in practice, ie, what are these non-Unix linkers?