Re: uninstalled modules do not build .so files

2008-12-29 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Andy, * Andy Wingo wrote on Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 07:18:18PM CET: > > Expected results: ./autogen.sh && make produces a .so file in .libs. > > Actual results: No .so file is produced. Content-Description: Makefile.am > # -*- makefile-gmake -*- > > noinst_LTLIBRARIES = libfoo.la > > libfo

Re: uninstalled modules do not build .so files

2008-12-26 Thread Dan Nicholson
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Andy Wingo wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On Tue 23 Dec 2008 19:25, "Dan Nicholson" writes: > >> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Andy Wingo wrote: >>> >>> Unpack the attached tarball (it will create its own directory). It is a >>> standard autotooled project with one fil

Re: uninstalled modules do not build .so files

2008-12-23 Thread Roumen Petrov
Andy Wingo wrote: Hi, So, this is a resend, as for some reason the silliest of autotools projects creates 300 kB tarballs. Attaching the files individually: unpack in a directory of their own please. *** Unpack the attached tarball (it will create its own directory). It is a standard autotool

uninstalled modules do not build .so files

2008-12-23 Thread Andy Wingo
Hi, So, this is a resend, as for some reason the silliest of autotools projects creates 300 kB tarballs. Attaching the files individually: unpack in a directory of their own please. *** Unpack the attached tarball (it will create its own directory). It is a standard autotooled project with one f