Re: ultrix, cache_file and ksh

2000-09-02 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Jul 28, 2000, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > + * ltconfig.in: only load $cache_file if it's a regular file Thanks, I'm checking this in -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.

Re: ultrix, cache_file and ksh

2000-07-28 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello, Assar! > > if test -n "$cache_file" && test -r "$cache_file" && test -f \ > > "$cache_file"; then > > > > Please check that it works for your ksh. > > Yeah, that works fine. Please commit that change and thanks for your > help. Maybe this patch will save time to somebody with write acc

Re: ultrix, cache_file and ksh

2000-07-27 Thread Assar Westerlund
Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, Assar! Hi, Pavel. > if test -n "$cache_file" && test -r "$cache_file" && test -f \ > "$cache_file"; then > > Please check that it works for your ksh. Yeah, that works fine. Please commit that change and thanks for your help. /assar

Re: ultrix, cache_file and ksh

2000-07-27 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello, Assar! > Is the following patch the right way of solving/working around this? It's usually better not to rely of exact names and especially on the path separator. The CVS version of Autoconf does it differently. It never sources anything other that regular files. "test -f" is used to chec

ultrix, cache_file and ksh

2000-07-26 Thread Assar Westerlund
I'm having problems using libtool-current on Ultrix 4.4 ltconfig re-execs ksh if it did not like the echo in the current shell (/bin/sh in my case), and the Ultrix ksh seems to dislike doing . /dev/null Is the following patch the right way of solving/working around this? /assar Index: ltconfig