On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 08:07:48AM +0200, Assar Westerlund wrote:
> Nick Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > OK. I am now seeing the same thing and the reason is that the configure
> > stuff for libltdl doesn't expect dlopen to exist in libc - it is
> > expecting it in libdl or libsvld. Parts o
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 08:07:48AM +0200, Assar Westerlund wrote:
> 2001-09-13 Assar Westerlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * ltdl.m4 (AC_LTDL_DLLIB): call dlopen with arguments so the test
> does not fail due to a prototype in dlfcn.h
Great! Thanks Assar.
Applied to HEAD and branch-
Nick Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK. I am now seeing the same thing and the reason is that the configure
> stuff for libltdl doesn't expect dlopen to exist in libc - it is
> expecting it in libdl or libsvld. Parts of the configure output are
> below..
The simple fix below (relative to cv
On Tuesday 17 July 2001 12:00 pm, Patrick Welche wrote:
> A quick look says that in ltdl.c, presym_open() if you get there with a
> call to lt_dlopen(0), filename is null, so
>
> if (!filename)
> {
> filename = "@PROGRAM@";
> }
>
> then later:
>
> if (!syms->address && st
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:22:40 +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 09:05:40PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> >
> > I am using automake from the stable branch, and autoconf-2.50, so I
can't
> > vouch for how well things work with development versions... you might
try
> >
A quick look says that in ltdl.c, presym_open() if you get there with a call
to lt_dlopen(0), filename is null, so
if (!filename)
{
filename = "@PROGRAM@";
}
then later:
if (!syms->address && strcmp(syms->name, filename) == 0)
as address==0, we look for syms->name ==
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 09:05:40PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>
> I am using automake from the stable branch, and autoconf-2.50, so I can't
> vouch for how well things work with development versions... you might try
> that configuration before digging too much. I have received a lot of patc
On Monday 16 July 2001 6:14 pm, Patrick Welche wrote:
> PASS: mdemo-static.test
> PASS: mdemo-make.test
> PASS: mdemo-exec.test
> PASS: mdemo-inst.test
> PASS: mdemo-unst.test
>
> PASS: mdemo-conf.test
> PASS: mdemo-make.test
> FAIL: mdemo-exec.test
> FAIL: mdemo-inst.test
> PASS: mdemo-unst.test
PASS: mdemo-static.test
PASS: mdemo-make.test
PASS: mdemo-exec.test
PASS: mdemo-inst.test
PASS: mdemo-unst.test
PASS: mdemo-conf.test
PASS: mdemo-make.test
FAIL: mdemo-exec.test
FAIL: mdemo-inst.test
PASS: mdemo-unst.test
PASS: mdemo-shared.test
PASS: mdemo-make.test
FAIL: mdemo-exec.test
FAIL:
