Robert Boehne [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Bob,
>
> Does this patch actually work? It looks to me like you're inheriting
> gcc's configuration and then changing one flag. If you have not run
> the test suite yet, run it and post the results.
All 105 tests passed
=
Bob,
Does this patch actually work? It looks to me like you're inheriting
gcc's
configuration and then changing one flag. If you have not run the test
suite yet, run it and post the results. Where did this compiler come
from?
I've been using Alphas since mips/ULTRIX went away, and I've never he
Here is a trivial patch to add Compaq's alpha c compiler (ccc) to
libtool.m4. This is against CVS head.
Cheers,
Bob McElrath [Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison, Department of Physics]
"You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the
freedom it gives its assimilated conf
Bob,
This patch isn't quite up to par. For one, it is against a very old
version of Libtool, and the method it uses is very sloppy. Generally
we check the compiler by it's name, when that isn't useful we check
what "-V or --version" returns, and as a last resort use pre-defined
preprocessor macr
libtool does not currently recognize the Compaq C Compiler on
linux/alpha. Specifically, it does not recognize that it can generate
PIC code and therefore shared libraries.
Attached is a patch against libtool.m4 which should allow this to work.
This is adapted from a patch I found on the web from
