Re: linking of indirect dependencies (dependency_libs) on Linux

Hi Steve, * Steve Langasek wrote on Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 03:37:18AM CEST: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 05:41:32PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > There were also a couple of bug reports related to Debian having > > link_all_deplibs=no, but the user expecting otherwise. > > For example, if you w

Re: linking of indirect dependencies (dependency_libs) on Linux

On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 05:41:32PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Steve Langasek wrote on Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 02:01:35PM CEST: > > Is there no one out there who can answer this question from my mail of last > > week, > I've been away, sorry for the late response. Ok, no worries. :) > > On T

Re: linking of indirect dependencies (dependency_libs) on Linux

On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 05:41:32PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Well, I can at least point you to much much more discussion about the > general issue. Alas, other (libtool and non-libtool related) work has > kept at least me from progressing in this regard. Also, the newer GNU > ld switches

linking of indirect dependencies (dependency_libs) on Linux

Hi Steve, * Steve Langasek wrote on Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 02:01:35PM CEST: > > Is there no one out there who can answer this question from my mail of last > week, I've been away, sorry for the late response. > or was the message simply drowned out in the flood of spam on the > list? :) We are _

Re: linking of indirect dependencies (dependency_libs) on Linux

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Langasek wrote: | Hi again, | | Is there no one out there who can answer this question from my mail of last | week, or was the message simply drowned out in the flood of spam on the | list? :) It is in the TODO file also, but it, obviously, is

Re: linking of indirect dependencies (dependency_libs) on Linux

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Langasek wrote: | Hi again, | | Is there no one out there who can answer this question from my mail of last | week, or was the message simply drowned out in the flood of spam on the | list? :) | | Thanks, Another thread:

Re: linking of indirect dependencies (dependency_libs) on Linux

Hi again, Is there no one out there who can answer this question from my mail of last week, or was the message simply drowned out in the flood of spam on the list? :) Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 03:07:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Last March, S

linking of indirect dependencies (dependency_libs) on Linux

Hi folks, Last March, Scott James Remnant put together a patch which fixed libtool to not gratuitously add indirect library dependencies to the linker line when doing shared linking on Linux. I was distraught to learn from him just yesterday that this patch was never actually accepted upstream.